That's an argument based on a false premise which I've successfully debunked many times.
ISIS wants to force their religion on people.
Christians in America want their rights restored so that other groups don't impose their secular views upon them and force them to be active participants in an act they deem morally objectionable.
But then, Liberals don't understand moral arguments because they don't have any morals.
That would be a nice thing. I would not refuse it.
If, however, they desire that even more than they desire the Lord, then they are a pretty poor witness about why anyone should want to be Christian.
I mean when push comes to shove... should we unwittingly take up the same tune as the homo crowd, and say that without the government’s sayso something can’t exist in reality?
If a right is God given then a government can go rogue and fight it, but it can’t overrule God... makes logical sense, no?
This is where the dimensions of the battle that extend past this world come into play. And all that gnarly stuff about witnesses and martyrs and crosses to bear. But also all that glorious stuff about victories... inevitably, the result of a staunchly faithful Christian attitude is to see the Kingdom progress on earth, not just to see Christians go down in colorful flames to wind up in heaven.
> But then, Liberals don’t understand moral arguments because they don’t have any morals.
Deserves to be repeated...