Skip to comments.
Support Grows for States to Ignore the Federal Courts
Rasmussen Reports ^
| 7/3/2015
| Rasmussen Reports
Posted on 07/03/2015 8:47:57 AM PDT by B Knotts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
The courts are out of control, and people are finally realizing that.
1
posted on
07/03/2015 8:47:58 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: B Knotts
Isn’t this what the whole constitutional concept of federalism was about in the first place?
To: B Knotts
The states need to take back their “rights”.
3
posted on
07/03/2015 8:50:08 AM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: freeangel
4
posted on
07/03/2015 8:50:42 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Just another Tenther)
To: B Knotts
C’mon states. Step up to the plate. Recognize usurped authority, and take appropriate action. Your citizens will support you. Do what is right, not what is convenient or safe. Have courage.
5
posted on
07/03/2015 8:54:40 AM PDT
by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: B Knotts
On this 4 of July Celebrate States Right’s and Independence, Federalism.
To: B Knotts
Yes! That is the only thing that might get me to respect my country again.
7
posted on
07/03/2015 8:55:22 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: B Knotts
8
posted on
07/03/2015 8:55:41 AM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: freeangel
Hence the need to remove all vestiges of the Confederacy.
9
posted on
07/03/2015 8:55:54 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
To: B Knotts
Yes, the liberals running the courts are definitely out of control.
10
posted on
07/03/2015 8:57:12 AM PDT
by
dowcaet
To: B Knotts
Somebody play this out form me. A state, say Oklahoma, passes a DOMA Act which is now clearly now unconstitutional (SCROTUS opinion not mine). So a minute later two faggots take it to Federal Court. So the Fed court says OKLA. your law is unconstitutional and OKLA says well we are not rescinding this law. What happens next?
Does Obastard send in the national guard or regular Army to arrest the OK legislature? What happens?
11
posted on
07/03/2015 8:57:14 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: freeangel
Remove the quotation marks and you’ll have it.
12
posted on
07/03/2015 8:58:26 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: American Constitutionalist
Remember to fly your state flag as well.
13
posted on
07/03/2015 8:58:48 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: ealgeone
Hence the need to remove all vestiges of the Confederacy.What the recent CBF brew-ha was really all about.
14
posted on
07/03/2015 8:59:15 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: B Knotts
Who would have ever guessed prior to 2008 that we would have come to this?
15
posted on
07/03/2015 8:59:26 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: B Knotts
The 10th amendment:
'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.'
16
posted on
07/03/2015 9:02:53 AM PDT
by
Popman
(Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
To: trisham
outside the borders of the U.S. ... nations are watching closer than ever before the U.S. ... waiting for the lighting of the fuse lain from the powder room by U.S. so-called leaders with ‘more flexible’ thoughts.
17
posted on
07/03/2015 9:03:39 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(If America Cared would a moslem cair?)
To: B Knotts
The next time I go in for jury duty I am going to tell the judge flat out that I have no respect for our judicial system, it is corrupt to the core, that the Supreme Court has no fidelity to the constitution or the laws of the states or the federal government, so I cannot in good conscience sit in judgment of my fellow citizens who are accused of breaking some law when it is clear that the words of the law will have no meaning whatsoever to the courts.
And if asked by the judge if I will follow his instructions I will say flatly that since the courts refuse to follow the instructions of the laws and the constitution, I will not abide by his words any more than the Supreme Court abides by the words of the constitution.
The principal result of judicial activism is that it has destroyed our system of checks and balances and has destroyed the very judicial system that they act under.
That should poison the whole jury pool.
Let these judges find an impartial jury when the court system is filled to overflowing with judges who show no impartiality at all to the laws they are sworn to uphold.
18
posted on
07/03/2015 9:04:26 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(Resistance to Tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: P-Marlowe
Fed govt should not be ruling on state matters. Flawed system
To: B Knotts
It is up to us to spread the word, that there can be no law while Federal employees are inclined to suddenly after hundreds of years of practice and understanding to ignore or rewrite law written & authorized by the people.
This is not how A republican Constitution works, much less how democracy is suppose to be. A judge is suppose to decide a case UNDER the law not pervert the law itself to say whatever he wants in defiance of hundreds of years of proven practice to the contrary. That is called lawmaking a power reserved to the people.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson