Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: How much longer can she hide the truth?
Fox News ^ | 7-2-15 | Andrew Napolitano

Posted on 07/03/2015 12:20:43 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Ann Archy

So was boner


41 posted on 07/03/2015 4:47:47 AM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
ALL leaders are COVERING UP for Obama and Hillary because they are IN ON IT!

McCain in particular; the old fart was the head cheerleader or the project.

42 posted on 07/03/2015 4:50:24 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Liz; LucyT; Hulka

Post #30, 31, 34, 36, 37
Videos from page

2:14 Minutes
Napolitano: What if Obama and Hillary are hiding the truth?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZogkzaVJ0eI

4:57 Minutes - Outnumbered
Report Hillary Clinton in final stages of planning 2016 run Fox News Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsVKNhJfaKU

Previous related article

What If They Are Hiding the Truth?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3301499/posts
http://townhall.com/columnists/judgeandrewnapolitano/2015/06/18/what-if-they-are-hiding-the-truth-n2013889


43 posted on 07/03/2015 5:00:56 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; Liz; LucyT
Thanks. But I need actual specific violations of code/law before I can find a wedge to dig deeper.

The arms sale process was done in accordance with FAR/AECA, the nation was on the approved list, the SME/MDE items were approved for export to that country, congressional notification done, etc. . .now, when a FMS deal is done there are third-party transfer limitations and that is where it is likely Hitlery did wrong, but need proof of that. The country can't do a third-party transfer without US approval, did they have it? Were FAR/AECA caveats for third-party transfers adhered to? FMS is hugely complex and difficult and not easily circumvented, especially on the US side. That is why I think it is a third-party transfer issue but need to know.

44 posted on 07/03/2015 5:12:24 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
She has been hiding the truth her whole life.


45 posted on 07/03/2015 5:43:27 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka; Whenifhow

SOURCE: http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rsat/c14027.htm

CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF TRANSFERS
Third party transfers are subject to requirements for Congressional notification under AECA, §3(d) (reference (c)), using guidelines similar to those for AECA, §36(b) (reference (c)) notifications (see Chapter 5, section C5.6).

A 30-day prior Congressional notification is required for third-party transfer requests that involve defense articles and services with original acquisition values that fall in one of the following categories: Major Defense Equipment (MDE) with an acquisition value equal to or greater than $14,000,000 for non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) recipients and $25,000,000 if the recipient is a member of NATO, Australia, Israel, Japan, New Zealand or Republic of Korea; or any other defense article or related training or defense service with an acquisition value of $50,000,000 or more for non-NATO recipients and $100,000,000 or more for NATO, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand recipients. Approval is granted after the 30-day (including weekends) period has expired if no objections are raised.

46 posted on 07/03/2015 5:44:53 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Bingo!

Not only were they in on it, the attack in Benghazi was planned with the intent to blame the terrorist getting the weapons on the “right wing extremist”.

Hillary was supposed to claim the attack was “spontaneous” which no one above the level of idiot was supposed to believe.

Hillary’s left wing rumor mill was supposed to claim the “right wing extremist” had collaborated with the terrorist in attacking the compound to make Obama look like another Peanuts Carter.

The republicans were then supposed to have their congressional hearings and come to the conclusion the terrorist had picked up on the dems honoring Peanuts at their convention and planned the attack to mimic the Iran hostage crisis. Take special notes of what was in Hillary’s recently released emails. The terrorist had planned the attack somewhere around 10-20 days before the attack. That’s the time period for the dems convention where Peanuts was honored.

Both dems and republicans are covered and the pesky “right wing extremist” are out of both of their hair.

Anyone that want’s to know which repubs were involved can start by looking at the GOPe that are outspoken against the TEA Party.

The louder they squawk against the TEA Party the more than likely they were involved.

I’m willing to bet my senator John Cornyn is one.


47 posted on 07/03/2015 5:56:35 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Catmom

a different question would be so what?

knowing and acting on the knowledge are different breeds of cat. acting and making any impact is yet a different breed

it was accomplished but in the middle, obama turned his back on the events and it all went to hell


48 posted on 07/03/2015 6:23:18 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator; afraidfortherepublic; Hulka

“......What I saw has persuaded me beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that Clinton provided material assistance to terrorists and lied to Congress in a venue where the law required her to be truthful. ...”

Aiding and abetting an enemy in time of war.

Lying and committing perjury.

Treason and high crimes and misdemeanors.

Unqualified to hold the office of POTUS.


49 posted on 07/03/2015 6:45:51 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hulka; Ann Archy; afraidfortherepublic

“.... Documentation of the process and transfers are many and everywhere,so there is no way they can be hidden (for long). Hundreds (maybe thousands) of people are involved and someone always talks.

Hitlery may have abetted arms transfers but it appears she did not do it in accordance with the law. . .and there are many others that KNOW this,people in the DoD and arms manufacturing world for example,and they will talk to avoid jail. ....”

Agreed, someone always talks.

Shrillary’s treason will out.


50 posted on 07/03/2015 6:51:58 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Who is going to call her out on this?
Bernie Sanders?
Someone at a scripted “townhall”?
News media?
Republican nominee?


51 posted on 07/03/2015 7:14:12 AM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

She can’t hide what she never had.


52 posted on 07/03/2015 7:19:41 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
CONNECTING THE DOTS:

Anti-2nd Amendment gun smuggler, Democrat Leland Yee, headed to prison
canadafreepress.com ^ | 7/3/2015 | Robert Laurie / FR Posted by rktman Cali state Sen Leland Lee---an anti-2nd Amendment Democrat ----also happens to be an international gun-runner and is going to jail.

BACK NOTE---the San Francisco Democrat was a fairly high-profile member of the California Legislature, but not a flamboyant one or one who was the subject of gossip and rumor. And that’s probably why the news in March landed with such a bombshell, when the 66 -year old former psychologist was arrested and charged with not only corruption, but also with allegedly participating in a scheme to smuggle illegal weapons into the United States. The irony was impossible to miss: gun trafficking charges against a Democrat who made a name for himself as a fierce advocate of gun control, a politician who championed a nationally debated California law to ban children from buying violent video games.

The FBI affidavit of secret meetings w/ Yee has details you'd expect of a mob thriller: murder for hire, gun running, marijuana farming, truckloads of contraband cigarettes and stolen liquor and political pay-for-play. The story is stranger still given the political corruption target. Yee holds a doctorate in child psychology and has held elected posts on the San Francisco school board and Board of Supervisors, and has sat in both the California Assembly and Senate. In the affidavit, he is described once as "Uncle Leland." And the

========================================================

BACKSTORY Gun-grabber Leland Yee knew where to get missiles, launchers, machine-guns etc....how'd he know that?

Did Lee get any help from Di/FI...and Hillary's State Dept?

SOURCE: http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rsat/c14027.htm

CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF ARMS TRANSFERS
Third party transfers are subject to requirements for Congressional notification under AECA, §3(d) (reference (c)), using guidelines similar to those for AECA, §36(b) (reference (c)) notifications (see Chapter 5, section C5.6).

A 30-day prior Congressional notification is required for third-party transfer requests that involve defense articles and services with original acquisition values that fall in one of the following categories: Major Defense Equipment (MDE) with an acquisition value equal to or greater than $14,000,000 for non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) recipients and $25,000,000 if the recipient is a member of NATO, Australia, Israel, Japan, New Zealand or Republic of Korea; or any other defense article or related training or defense service with an acquisition value of $50,000,000 or more for non-NATO recipients and $100,000,000 or more for NATO, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand recipients.

Approval is granted after the 30-day (including weekends) period has expired if no objections are raised.

=============================================

NOW GO GET DI/FI.

CONT BELOW

53 posted on 07/03/2015 7:48:56 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
CONT

BACKSTORY: Back in Sept 2014, Senate intel head Di/Fi was whining about the CIA looking through her computers and taking documents. Clearly, the CIA had plenty on her----even BEFORE the shocking Chi/Com missile scandal broke.

Di/Fi's known aversion to guns did not prevent her from honoring jailbird Lee's co-defendant, Raymond Chow---Chow is the key figure in Cali's Demorat state Sen Leland Yee's shocking missile deal w/ China (Yee is a notorious grabber of American guns).

INCONVENIENT FACTOIDS:

<><>Feinstein heads the Senate Intel Committee;

<><> Her hubby Richard Blum made million as the lawyer for Chinese interests;

<><> gun-grabber Leland Yee knew where to get missiles, launchers, machine-guns etc;

<><> Co-conspirator Raymond Chow was jailed, then freed when he professed to be a “really nice guy”.... honored by Di/Fi for working with local Chinese youths.

====================================================

EVERYBODY KNOWS THE DI/FI STORY COULD DWARF YEE'S ARMS DEAL: Taxpayers demand and investigation of Di/Fi's intel activities.

<><> Did Di use her access to valuable US security data improperly?

<><> Hubby Richard Blum made millions in China deals in past years. How'd he do that?

<><> Is hubby cutting new deals w/ the Chi/Coms?

=======================================

FBI TIP PAGE https://tips.fbi.gov

============================================

ARE THE CLINTONS INVOLVED?----THIS DI/FI HILLARY SUCK-UP WAS VERY INSTRUCTIVE---DI even dropped the term "foreign policy" “In my view, she’s in the prime of her political life. She’s got the energy. She’s articulate. She’s got the background. She’s got the smarts. She has all of the elements of a good leader plus the fact, and this is not to be underestimated, she is enormously attractive to people,” she said on CNN's "State of the Union." “And she carries the torch for women who are the majority of votes in this country, very strongly and very high.”

Hillary's hefty income includes:

Hualuo CEO Forum (Spouse) Shanghai, China $550,000

Telefonaktiebolagel LM Ericsson AB (Spouse) Hong Kong, China $750,000

54 posted on 07/03/2015 7:49:34 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Hillary will never be president—image the debate between Hillary and Trump? or Hillary and Ted Cruz or Hillary and Walker? or even Hillary vs Bush III? Fact # 1 Hillary aint Black. Fact #2 Hillary aint Bill, Fact #3 No one wants a 3rd Obama Term.


55 posted on 07/03/2015 8:51:46 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Yeah. . .I know about the laws and regs and such, spent decades working in and studying FMS, so that is why I think her activities that might be illegal are in the third-party transfer part.

What I (we) need is actual proof that Qatar did transfer FMS arms and those transfers did not receive congressional approval (i.e., no notification).

That 30-day notification is broke down as 10-days unofficial notification and 20-day official notification. Congress wants time to get a look-see before they are on the clock.

Find that proof and then we can do something. Until then, all documents I've found show FMS arms sales to Qatar were done in accordance with the law.

56 posted on 07/03/2015 9:34:22 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

VOTER FRAUD has put more than one donkey in the white house


57 posted on 07/03/2015 12:44:27 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now?;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson