Cuz what the NY Times really wants to do is help Republican politicians.
Hard right turn.... laughable
Oh no! The New York Times is concerned.
The NYT seems to regularly use “hard right” describing Republicans.... but it seems they’ve never seen a Democrat that was “hard left”.
Meanwhile the socialist Bernie Sanders is drawing huge crowds of Democrats in Wisconsin and elsewhere. Hmm. Should the New York Times question the extreme left turn of Democratic Party might cost them too in 2016? Of course not the NYT, Bernie, etc are all fellow travelers.
Strange how with the BY Slimes the focus is ALWAYS on the Republican candidates in terms of scrutinization.
Hitlery's high crimes, howver, go UNDISCUSSED and UNPUNISHED.
Moderator note: FR.. it may be time to update your spell checker.
Both undiscussed and scrutinixation showed a red underline signifying that they were incorrect in spelling.
NOT true. Checked them both and they are listed in dictionary.com and are BOTH listed as acceptable English language words and spellings.
Strange how with the NY Slimes the focus is ALWAYS on the Republican candidates in terms of scrutinization.
Hitlery's high crimes, howver, go UNDISCUSSED and UNPUNISHED.
Moderator note: FR.. it may be time to update your spell checker.
Both undiscussed and scrutinixation showed a red underline signifying that they were incorrect in spelling.
NOT true. Checked them both and they are listed in dictionary.com and are BOTH listed as acceptable English language words and spellings.
Do you expect us to believe that the NYT cares about anyone from Iowa or Wisconsin?
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
NY Times is obviously biased against white, heterosexual men.
Because that’s all they criticise.
Well, if the New York Times says so, it MUST be true!