How about she just refused on religious grounds, and then keep her job?
There is tons of precedent for this.
Running away is surrendering this fight. As long as people aren’t forced to perform fag weddings then IDGARA.
EXACTLY
why did she not just stay at her job and see if she is fired. If she is then she files a lawsuit for her religious beliefs. now a left wing hack or a homosexual will take her place.
How is this good news for us?
“How about she just refused on religious grounds, and then keep her job?”
That might have been possible within the scope of her employer’s written guidelines. If she’d stayed, they could’ve made her life miserable.
I worked for a city in California in the H.R. department. I was told by the Director that we were “encouraged” to attend a same-sex “commitment” ceremony for one of the women employees and her partner. I refused — on religious grounds. My life was a living nightmare from then on; my boss made sure of that. I retired a couple years later and it was maybe the happiest day of my life.
So what a person technically CAN do, and what’s the smart thing to do can be two different things. And can you even imagine working eight hours a day with homosexuals in heat traipsing into your office? Even if somebody else is issuing the licenses, still... Who wants to see that?
If I had been in her shoes, I would have figured that in God's eyes, keeping the job while refusing on religious grounds to carry out certain tasks and leaving them to co-workers of less or no faith, would have been surrender.
Say you're a nurse in a doctor's office and assist him in all kinds of procedures to help heal people. Then he adds abortions to his out-patient services. Would you quit working for that doctor because you object to what is surely murder in the eyes of the Lord, or would you insist that when your boss the doctor performed abortions, he used another nurse to assist, but you'd remain to help in every other way for him to continue running a successful practice?
This woman put her money where her mouth is. Staying and declining to do certain work on the technicality of "refusal on religious grounds" would have been surrender.
Standing strong for righteousness is the ONLY way to achieve victory.
There is much truth to this. Can we bring attention to this disparity of justice by simply fading away? Or is Truth better served by screaming and fighting to the last man?
I know this, the enemy (liberals and liberalism of both parties) want us to quietly slink away. Therefore the answer must be to stand and fight.
There might be precedent, but it is no longer of any use.
The Constitution SPECIFICALLY protects freedom of religion.
NO WHERES does it mention “marriage” or “queers” or “queers and marriage”.
But man’s new law WILL supersede Gods law.
I hate to sound so prophetic or mysterious or religious but thiz is seriously looking like the end times!