Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Why can’t two consenting adults agree to one paying the other for a ride? Union bosses and socialists everywhere would sooner allow prostitution than an Uber ride.


4 posted on 06/29/2015 9:31:35 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew

Only if they can tax it!


6 posted on 06/29/2015 9:32:49 PM PDT by null and void (What's the bigger danger: the Confederate flag, or the false flag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lacrew

Prostitutes have to be licensed in parts of Europe.


7 posted on 06/29/2015 9:47:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lacrew

otherwise known as carpooling


13 posted on 06/29/2015 10:38:00 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lacrew
Why can’t two consenting adults agree to one paying the other for a ride?

That is one of several possible configurations of the society. That's how it works when colonists arrive and set up first villages. They buy and sell directly, treating each other as individuals, not as companies.

However today France - and any other modern country - is not set up that way. It has a government, and that government is tasked with collecting money from taxpayers and spending it on defense, on social security, or - among other programs - on spaceflight. Taxpayers are individuals and businesses.

Uber apparently is skipping the obligations of a business, but enjoying the privileges. Paying the taxes is just one, most obvious aspect of it. But I'm sure there are more. How about business insurance? Does the driver carry a business policy, one that will be valid if he has an accident while transporting people for profit? How about work hours? How about making sure that his car is checked by a mechanic every day? (Or, does the passenger want to ride in a car that makes one million miles per year but rarely gets checked?) Does the vehicle's design protect the rider from the driver, and vice versa?

The business license may look like a bureaucratic excuse for grabbing some money, but *in this world* it is also a stabilizing factor. If you buy a pizza, you can be more or less sure that it is made in sanitary conditions, from fresh ingredients. That's one aspect of regulation - enforcement of some standards that are required for safety.

I can definitely see that Uber is a disruptive technology. Taxicab drivers were always a special club that is expensive (or impossible) to enter. Cities used sales of permits (medallions) to raise lots of money. Cab companies and drivers then charged the riders with high fees to cover these costs and enjoyed their monopoly position. Uber makes them all obsolete. The problem is not with old companies, and not with new companies, but with the fact that both exist in the same space and at the same time.

14 posted on 06/29/2015 10:59:00 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson