Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2015 8:57:32 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: nickcarraway

it is time for the people to speak too


2 posted on 06/28/2015 8:59:33 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

No surprise. Bondi is as cheese eating surrender monkey.


3 posted on 06/28/2015 8:59:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

A lawless court defying constitutional law, natural law and God’s law. Bondi, do your duty as a Christian and as someone who took an oath to support the Constitution and DEFY that SCOTUS “ruling.”


5 posted on 06/28/2015 9:03:44 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Dissolve the damned court.

Why the Hell as free people are we being told how our society must be?


7 posted on 06/28/2015 9:16:00 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

She is still talking about the rule of law!

More like the rule of a couple of faggot lawyers.

Sic Semper Tyrannis.


8 posted on 06/28/2015 9:16:25 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Well, Bondi, the court may have spoken, but Christ is coming back VERY soon and has said "Vengence is mine, saith the LORD!"

The court is getting directly in God's face with this and mocking the crowning act of HIS creation.

I would normally say "may God have mercy on their souls" but since the 2/3rds majority of the court is supposedly Catholic, I won't even bother with that statement as they ought to know better already!!!

9 posted on 06/28/2015 9:18:06 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Help Stamp Out Pernicious Progressives and Arrogant Activists With Their Liberalism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“legal efforts were not about personal beliefs or opinions”

Apparently they are. And if 5 supreme court judges can ignore the document from which they derive their authority, we can ignore their supposed authority on this subject as well.

The time has come for people in all stations of life — whether that be county clerk, or governor, or state judge — to exercise the moral imperative of civil disobedience to unjust laws, decrees, orders, policies, and judgments handed down to us by unjust rulers.


10 posted on 06/28/2015 9:18:07 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

That Was Quick… Polygamists, Ped*philes Push for Their Civil Rights, Too
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/06/that-was-quick-polygamists-pedphiles-push-for-their-civil-rights-too/#ixzz3eQCl4QL2


11 posted on 06/28/2015 9:19:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

the ‘rule of law’ states people are not to enter the country without authorization and anyone here without authorization is in violation of the law and subject to arrest and deportation. the ‘rule of law’ also states any businesses knowingly employing illegals can be fined or shut down.

the ‘rule of law’ also states it’s treasonous to provide aid and comfort to the enemy in times of war. providing $5 billion to the enemy is considered aid and would therefore be treasonous.

i could go on for pages... needless to say, she’s got no ground to stand on with that ‘rule of law’ bs.

two of the justices had campaigned for homo marriage prior to receiving the case. their bias is without question.

the ‘rule of law’ would have demanded they be removed from the case.


13 posted on 06/28/2015 9:20:40 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Pam Bondi, Confidant of Mitt Romney.

Seeing a patter here?


14 posted on 06/28/2015 9:22:44 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
No, Blondie. 5 of the 9 members of a black robed Supreme Court who have arrogated to themselves complete power and are ignoring the Constitution have spoken - and 2 of those should have recused themselves from this case under their own ethics rules. The entire thing is a fraud and a disgrace.

We are now ruled by 5 tyrants, at least 2 of which are completely illegitimate but because they are female and lesbians they are getting away with it...

16 posted on 06/28/2015 9:26:35 PM PDT by Gritty (The wicked strut freely about when what is vile is honored among men - Psalm 12:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I’ll give this Court decree the same respect that Obama gave to DOMA, and observe it with the same honor that his administration give to our laws regarding illegal aliens.

In other words, they can take this ruling and shove it up their damned posteriors! They no longer have any legitimacy when it comes to “rule of law.”


20 posted on 06/28/2015 9:46:33 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Whoooa, hold everything....

New Laws are needed for “Same Sex Marriages.”

The Supreme Court decision on gay marriage must be amended by stating gay marriage is a health risk to the community.
As we know gays are prohibited from giving blood. If you have ever given blood this is one of the questions, “have you had sex with another man”.
Many STD are transmitted by homosexuals. Therefore there should be a mandatory WAITING PERIOD for a same sex marriage license to be issued.
Tests must be required at the application time and at the time the marriage license is issued.
A waiting period of XX number of days is needed to see if there is any disease present in the same sex applicants.
State and local government can pass these laws for same sex marriages.
This law would be covered by the 10th Amendment for States Rights.


21 posted on 06/28/2015 9:47:09 PM PDT by hapnHal (hapnHal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The COURT has made their decision! Now let’s see them enforce it!

How many Battalions does the COURT have!


22 posted on 06/28/2015 9:48:33 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Pam Blondie is just another one of the enormous RINOs we grow here in FL. Every one of them, including Blondie, will swear up and down that they are conservatives. Just ask JEB!, Marco, and Charlie Crist (when he used to be a republican).


25 posted on 06/28/2015 10:20:17 PM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

wonder if she will defend Plessy v Ferguson...the SC ok’d segregation. So Bondi should start supporting that since the SC made it law of the land.


26 posted on 06/28/2015 10:25:36 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“The court has spoken” has as little significance and “The MSNBC anchor has spoken”. It just means someone with an extreme bias has aired their political opinions. The court is supposed to have more authority, but they lost all legitimacy. Obama’s goons enforcing the gay “marriage” ruling are simply goons.


28 posted on 06/29/2015 2:18:37 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

GOD has Spoken......GOD WILL NOT BE MOCKED!!!


29 posted on 06/29/2015 2:36:50 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

She is right


32 posted on 06/29/2015 4:12:52 AM PDT by rrrod (Just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Pam Bondi needs to go back to school to learn history.

A). In 1857, the SCROTUM issued what was until this week the worst decision ever. In Dred Scott v. Sanford, SCROTUM ruled that blacks could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. IT WAS THE LAW OF THE LAND.

B). Northern abolitionists refused to accept the LAW OF THE LAND fomenting dissent and indirectly leading to the “Civil War”.

C). The rule of law is the legal principle that law should govern a nation, as opposed to being governed by arbitrary decisions of individual government officials. THERE IS NO RULE OF LAW ANYMORE.

D). No government or law or ruling can force one to do evil. Evil is in the heart and needs no prodding. GOD HAS GIVEN US THE LAW. BREAK IT AT YOUR SOUL’S PERIL.


34 posted on 06/29/2015 4:30:44 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson