To: campaignPete R-CT
Right. The Bushs’ did a great job nominating Ginsburg and Kennedy.
3 posted on
06/28/2015 6:56:17 PM PDT by
mosaicwolf
(Strength and Honor)
To: mosaicwolf
Kennedy was appointed by Reagan after Bork and his second choice where not seated by the Senate. He was Reagan’s third choice and a complete unknown who LIED to those who vetted him for the post. Remember only Democrats are afforded the benefit of having their nominees seated. Republicans must always try to find someone who MAY be Conservative. Democrats, on the other hand, simply appoint the most Liberal lawyers they can find and the Republicans rubber stamp them.
7 posted on
06/28/2015 7:00:56 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: mosaicwolf
Right. The Bushs’ did a great job nominating Ginsburg and Kennedy.
Bush nominated neither Kennedy nor Ginsburg. Fool.
10 posted on
06/28/2015 7:04:06 PM PDT by
campaignPete R-CT
(A Christian man who is content to be ruled by Elena Kagan is no Christian and not a man.)
To: mosaicwolf
11 posted on
06/28/2015 7:06:36 PM PDT by
sport
To: mosaicwolf
Arkansas Senators rejected Bork and voted YEA on Elena Kagan. both senators.
good job, Arkansas.
13 posted on
06/28/2015 7:09:59 PM PDT by
campaignPete R-CT
(A Christian man who is content to be ruled by Elena Kagan is no Christian and not a man.)
To: mosaicwolf
Clinton nominated Ginsburg, and Kennedy was a Reagan nomination. The Bush’s have enough on their plate without crediting them with those two.
14 posted on
06/28/2015 7:11:03 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson