Skip to comments.
Alabama Senate Passes Bill to Effectively Nullify All Sides on Marriage
10th Amendment Center ^
| May 23, 2015
| Shane Trejo
Posted on 06/28/2015 4:59:21 AM PDT by tje
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-176 next last
To: LibertarianLiz
“Yes, but, wouldn’t that give the Christian churches the chance to sue for discrimination as the law is not being enforced “equally” among all citizens?”
One would think. However, don’t be surprised if the court held that Christian Churches had no standing to bring such an action.
141
posted on
06/28/2015 11:28:18 AM PDT
by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: ansel12
They (Puritans founders of Massachusetts) believed that marriage was not a religious ceremony but a civil contract. The beginning of their fall from grace. Now they are communist Massachusetts, and the Godless Universalist Unitarians.
142
posted on
06/28/2015 11:34:30 AM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
To: ROCKLOBSTER
You live in your own little world.
143
posted on
06/28/2015 11:42:37 AM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
What, you deny that's true?
Massachusetts used to be part of Maine.
You live in your own little world.
Yes, now we have 1.5 million people in the whole state.
144
posted on
06/28/2015 11:52:47 AM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
To: eyedigress
I agree. You want to get married, go to DC.Or the arm of DC that's the most convenient to you - SS office or federal court, e.g. Better still, just apply online or call it in. Why do you need to show up in person anywhere? You can apply online for all sorts of licenses - why not a marriage license? Leave the religious aspects of it to religious institutions.
145
posted on
06/28/2015 11:54:04 AM PDT
by
randita
(...Our First Lady is a congenital liar - William Safire, 1996)
To: ROCKLOBSTER
146
posted on
06/28/2015 11:58:46 AM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
If you are so cowardly that you want to hide what you are responding to on freerepublic, that is your cowardly, dishonest character flaw.
Go be fruitful and multiply, but not in those words.
147
posted on
06/28/2015 11:59:13 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
To: SunkenCiv
Don’t try to conceal who, and what, you are responding to.
Be open and true.
148
posted on
06/28/2015 12:07:07 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
I have and am. Your problem -- and it is your problem -- is that you are so full of yourself that you believe I'd read and was responding to your angry screed throughout the topic. I had not seen it.
Here's a response now -- you are not a mind-reader, you are merely a rude troll.
149
posted on
06/28/2015 12:16:24 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
To: SunkenCiv
Actually no, I and none of us had any idea who or what you were responding to on the thread, because you try to conceal that, be open and true.
You might tone down the hysterics some as well, no need to scream.
150
posted on
06/28/2015 12:22:24 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
Again, LIAR, I never have tried to conceal anything. Get it? Get over yourself.
151
posted on
06/28/2015 12:33:38 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
To: SunkenCiv
you dont set the rules of how I post. Who or what, was post 112 to?
152
posted on
06/28/2015 12:40:45 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
What’s goofy is you guys claiming it’s a left-wing smear attack on Jefferson.
Why would they attack their own guy?
(I suppose you have an answer for that)
153
posted on
06/28/2015 2:10:32 PM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
To: ROCKLOBSTER
154
posted on
06/28/2015 2:17:02 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
Is that your final answer?
155
posted on
06/28/2015 2:21:01 PM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
To: AppyPappy
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I mistook you to mean as though the license was issued and enforced by the US Federal government. I see now you mean federalized as in “federalism” which simply binds the separate states together under the US government.
Yes, the states accept all other states licenses as a matter of choice, not force. If one stated decided not to allow it, they could. Stupid, but they could.
Just as my California engineering license does not allow me to be able to stamp engineering plans in any other state but California.
So we are saying the same thing. As I said, the other states are just reciprocating by choice in allowing drivers to use their own state’s license in their state.
I think we are saying the same thing.
156
posted on
06/28/2015 3:19:39 PM PDT
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(I demand a Constitutional Amendment establishing Marriage as one man and one woman.)
To: tje
Does anyone know why the states issue marriage licenses in the first place? Because the progressives wanted to control the process to make sure no white people married black people. And blood tests were instituted by the progressives to ensure that nobody produced any “undesirables”.
157
posted on
06/28/2015 5:19:43 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: TBP
Yep, there’s really no reason for a license. Do people really think their relationships are any better if they are ‘blessed’ by the state?
158
posted on
06/28/2015 5:32:49 PM PDT
by
tje
To: TBP
Does anyone know why the states issue marriage licenses in the first place? Because the progressives wanted to control the process to make sure no white people married black people. And blood tests were instituted by the progressives to ensure that nobody produced any undesirables.That isn't why.
The license predates any of that, and banns predate licenses.
159
posted on
06/28/2015 7:18:33 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
To: ansel12
Actually, that is the reason.
160
posted on
06/28/2015 7:34:57 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-176 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson