Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Nikki Haley is smart to want to remove South Carolina’s Confederate flag
WaPo ^ | 6/22/15 | Philip Bump

Posted on 06/22/2015 11:48:57 AM PDT by ghost of stonewall jackson

Edited on 06/22/2015 12:13:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-278 last
To: CodeToad

That’s all the punny he’ll ever likely have

Porn sites and ma and her four daughters

Pity

Well not really

In the long run best he not reproduce


261 posted on 06/23/2015 7:55:14 PM PDT by wardaddy (#jon snow mattered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Rockette to his credit has survived the bolt

Unlike nonsensical

But these south haters have to really step in it repeatedly to get Fresno to kill them permanently

Or catch Thompson in a bad mood....lol


262 posted on 06/23/2015 7:57:21 PM PDT by wardaddy (#jon snow mattered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Darling .. he used that word as a slam. Did you have any comment about the word retard being used against Sarah Palin’s child?

No one wins an argument/debate when they resort to name calling.


263 posted on 06/23/2015 8:09:03 PM PDT by conservaKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: conservaKate
"Darling .. he used that word as a slam."

Don't be so sensitive, snookums. Have you never heard the term "full retard" before? Catch up.

" Did you have any comment about the word retard being used against Sarah Palin’s child?"

This has nothing to do with Sarah Palin or her child. Stop trying to bring cheap (and irrelevant) emotion to the topic.

"No one wins an argument/debate when they resort to name calling."

You weren't called a name.

I'll tell you what's guaranteed to lose an argument, though---accusations of racism. It's very liberal of you.

264 posted on 06/23/2015 8:15:59 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( ((("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Bless your heart... you looked back on my posting history .. and were disappointed you didn’t find any racially insensitive posts. Wow ... that sure makes me look bad.


265 posted on 06/23/2015 8:18:06 PM PDT by conservaKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: conservaKate
"racially insensitive"

LOL

Roll around in that self-congratulation...cover yourself with it. Is it nice and warm?

266 posted on 06/23/2015 8:23:37 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( ((("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: maro

> This is why the Confederate flag will come down from the SC statehouse.<

The battle flag was taken down from the SC statehouse over a decade ago.

You’re a little late to the event. That flag currently flies over a war memorial. That memorial does happen to be on state property. The earlier move was in response to a bunch of breast beating and histrionics by leftists about how something just had to be done about that awful flag. So, something was done. The leftists were mollified for a short time, we now see.

I see this as a freedom of expression problem. Your reality is totally different from many who fly this particular flag. The flag has meaning for many people. If you do not like the flag, by all means don’t fly it or own it. Your opinion does not trump the opinion of others. It most certainly does not neutralize their rights of freedom of expression.

The South Carolina legislature will ultimately decide what happens to this flag, not the Governor. It’s my understanding that the flag may be removed from the war memorial only by a 2/3rds majority vote to do so. I think Governor Haley has a long road to getting such a large majority to follow her against their constituents’ wishes.


267 posted on 06/23/2015 8:33:50 PM PDT by Darnright (No, We Love Yeshua (Jesus).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ghost of stonewall jackson

“Why Nikki Haley is smart to want to remove South Carolina’s Confederate flag”

Let me guess... because she wants to see if she can demolish the Republican “southern strategy” that dates back to Nixon?

Well done, Nimrata Nikki Randhawa.


268 posted on 06/23/2015 9:37:45 PM PDT by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maro

Then don’t buy one.


269 posted on 06/23/2015 9:40:04 PM PDT by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

“Who here still supports segregation? That is why this flag went up in the first place”

The flag went up to mark the Centennial of the Civil War, but feel free to keep repeating the Left’s revisionist history.

“The first time it flew

Daniel Hollis, a member of the commission responsible for planning South Carolina’s Confederate War Centennial, recalled the exact day the flag was first hoisted during an interview published in 1999.

Hollis said the flag itself went up on April 11, 1961, for the opening of the Civil War centennial “at the request of Aiken Rep. John A. May.”

“May told us he was going to introduce a resolution to fly the flag for a year from the capitol. I was against the flag going up,” Hollis said, “but I kept quiet and went along.”

The resolution was approved in 1962, but never included a date for the flag’s removal.

“It just stayed up,” Hollis said. “Nobody raised a question.”

Hollis died in 2008.”

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jun/22/eugene-robinson/confederate-flag-wasnt-flown-south-carolina-state-/


270 posted on 06/23/2015 9:50:35 PM PDT by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

I am not a Southerner. My experience has been that many of the people who fly the flag or use the flag as a symbol are at least a little racist. Not all, but enough to make me uncomfortable. South Carolina can do what it wants. But major employers are watching. No big company wants to deal with the Confederate flag issue.


271 posted on 06/24/2015 8:38:18 AM PDT by maro (what did the President know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I just now happened across this personal attack of you at post #43. Your response was much better than mine.


272 posted on 06/24/2015 8:57:09 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Lincoln was clearly against slavery. That was a plus on his ledger, IMO. He was, of course, a politician and pragmatist, and some of his views on race did reflect those of his constituents and the times. For example, the following statement may reflect Lincoln's beliefs as well as those of the American people (from the black historian Carter G. Woodson 1922 cited in "Lincoln and Civil Rights for Blacks" by Mary Frances Berry [Source]):

... the large majority of Americans of Lincoln's day believed that the two races could not dwell together on the basis of social and political equality.

Lincoln had been an advocate of colonization of blacks in Liberia since the 1840s [Link]. He had also been one of the managers of the Illinois State Colonization Society in the 1850s [Link]. Colonization of blacks out of the country seems to have been a long held belief with him.

Some historians and some on these threads have argued that by 1863 Lincoln gave up his intent to move large numbers of blacks out of the country given that he apparently did not believe they and whites could live successfully together. But, in fact, Lincoln kept investigating possibilities for colonization of blacks elsewhere.

Lincoln sent General Dan Sickles to Colombia in 1865 to discuss black colonization there. Here, from the Dayton Daily Empire Newspaper of June 2, 1865 is the following mention of Sickles, Lincoln and the mission to Colombia [Source].

The Negroes of the U.S. To Be Sent To Bogota

It is understood that the mission of General Sickles to Bogota was for the purpose of obtaining grants of lands for the purpose of settling them with blacks from the United States, and that the late President who authorized the mission, was willing to give fifteen millions of dollars for adequate territory.

That is consistent with the finding that Lincoln kept pushing the colonization idea well after the emancipation proclamation [Link].

Frederick Douglass, the author of the quote in your previous post, disagreed strongly with Lincoln over colonization. Here is Douglass on colonization in 1849: [Link].

Some say that in 1865 Douglass had convinced Lincoln not to push colonization. Maybe, maybe not. In addition to the 1865 mission of General Sickles above, Lincoln was still discussing colonization with Benjamin Butler in April 1865 [Link].

I have brought up before on these threads that when Lincoln was a Congressman in the 1840s, he included in his bill to free Washington DC's slaves a section that was basically a fugitive slave law designed to let slave owners recover slaves that escaped into DC. That doesn't fit the popular view of Lincoln, but it did reflect the realities of the time as far as political compromise went. However, his bill did not get much support, and it died.

Very shortly after he became president, a Fugitive Slave Commissioner friend of his in Springfield, Illinois provided a Missouri slave holder with the authority to collect his escaped slaves in Chicago, which was then a long-time refuge for fugitive slaves. I have always felt that Lincoln might have prodded his friend to do that since it would indicate to the South that Lincoln would enforce the Fugitive Slave Law even in northern sanctuary cities. As a consequence of the Missouri man recovering his slaves in Chicago, many hundreds of fugitive slaves immediately left Chicago for Canada in early April 1861. They had gotten the message.

273 posted on 06/24/2015 1:21:48 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Thank you, FRiend.


274 posted on 06/24/2015 4:37:11 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( ((("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
"But only ONE flag, The Old Glory meaning stars and stripes for ever, should fly on government buildings."

State governments should be able to fly any flag they want on their property.

275 posted on 07/12/2015 3:31:15 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

I was talking about federal buildings. On state buildings I agree with you. And SC decided to not fly the confederate flag on the state house.


276 posted on 07/12/2015 3:38:12 PM PDT by entropy12 (Illegal and welfare dependent legal immigrants are the real problem. Wake up America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

So I suppose you are ok with the Rainbow flag being projected onto the facade of the White house? That’s federal property, correct? Direct me to your post where you objected do that.


277 posted on 07/13/2015 2:18:16 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

No I am not Ok with any gay agenda.

But what dudnderheads do not understand is that if illegals and more legal immigrants are allowed in the country, the social conservative agenda will be screwed for 100 years or more. All those immigrants vote 80% for LIBERAL democrats.

Do you think scial conservatives will benefit with Hillary/Sanders/whoever?

Some people just can’t think long term.


278 posted on 07/13/2015 9:24:29 AM PDT by entropy12 (Illegal and welfare dependent legal immigrants are the real problem. Wake up America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-278 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson