I knew that language had been included. I would like to read the Cruz/Sessions immigration language.
I think that in addition to what was already in previous TPA bills, this should reassure those concerned about our sovereignty being compromised. Thank you for posting this.
I’m curious—how can it be Cruz/Sessions language, since Sessions still opposes TPA? (Jeff Sessions, that is.)
S.Amdt.1384 to S.Amdt.1221 (a little over 1/2 way down) [Page S3081/2]
SA 1384. Mr. HATCH (for Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Inhofe)) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1221 proposed by Mr. Hatch to the bill H.R. 1314, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a right to an administrative appeal relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt status of certain organizations; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the end of section 102(a), add the following:
As you can see from the bill text link I gave section 102(a) ends at (13). There is no (14).
Keep in mind the dates...
06/12/2015 On motion to concur in portion of Senate amendment preceding title II Agreed to by recorded vote: 219 - 211
I can't find anything more current, even on Thomas.