Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativejoy
I would like to read the Cruz/Sessions immigration language.

S.Amdt.1384 to S.Amdt.1221 (a little over 1/2 way down) [Page S3081/2]
SA 1384. Mr. HATCH (for Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Inhofe)) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1221 proposed by Mr. Hatch to the bill H.R. 1314, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a right to an administrative appeal relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt status of certain organizations; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the end of section 102(a), add the following:

(14) to ensure that trade agreements do not require changes to the immigration laws of the United States.

As you can see from the bill text link I gave section 102(a) ends at (13). There is no (14).

Keep in mind the dates...
06/12/2015 On motion to concur in portion of Senate amendment preceding title II Agreed to by recorded vote: 219 - 211

I can't find anything more current, even on Thomas.

80 posted on 06/19/2015 11:30:36 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: conservativejoy
So his efforts were for naught and, from my understanding, trade agreements can now make changes to the immigration laws of the United States
82 posted on 06/19/2015 11:33:38 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson