Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The American middle class isn’t coming back — it’s going to die with the Baby Boomers
Salon ^ | June 15, 2015 | Scott Timberg

Posted on 06/15/2015 12:22:04 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

It’s no secret that the American middle class has been on the ropes for a while now. The problem isn’t just a crippling recession and an economic “recovery” that has mostly gone to the richest one percent, but the larger shifting of wealth from the middle to the very top that’s taken place since the late ‘70s. Add in things like the dismantling of unions that has accelerated apace since Ronald Reagan crushed the air-traffic controllers, and we’ve seen the middle class more solid in places like Canada, Germany, and Scandinavia, and begin to grow in a number of nations even while it shrinks here. Economists like Thomas Piketty thinks the process is inevitable with global capitalism, while others – the equally wise Joseph Stiglitz, for example – think the balance can be restored if we can find the political will.

It turns out that those concerned about a tattered middle class are right about most of it, but overlooking one thing: Boomers – or rather, a particular strain of Boomer and near-Boomer – are doing great. That is, if you were born in the ‘40s, you are going to be the last American generation to enjoy a robust safety net, and your gray years will be far more comfortable than those a decade older or younger.

Here’s a New York Times story, which looks at “the 25 million Americans now between the ages of 65 and 74”:

Supported by income from Social Security, pensions and investments, as well as an increasing number of paychecks from delaying retirement, older people not only weathered the economic downturn that began in 2007 but made significant gains, a New York Times analysis of government data has found.

And despite our generally ornery Xer jingoism, we’re going to concede something here. We’ve noticed that our friends who we could call “young Boomers” – born in the late ‘50s and early ’60s – are often far less privileged and spoiled than those born in the years right after World War II. This younger group grew up or came of ago, after all, in the ‘70s and ‘80s, as the postwar boom was fading, colleges were becoming expensive, and the Reagan Revolution was pulling the rug out from under the middle class.

And it turns out that those young Boomers are indeed a kind of transition generation. It’s the group now retiring that will take most of the spoils of the U.S. postwar boom and leave the rest of us with scraps:

In the past, the elderly were usually poorer than other age groups. Now, they are the last generation to widely enjoy a traditional pension, and are prime beneficiaries of a government safety net targeted at older Americans. They also have profited from the long rise in real estate prices that preceded the recession. As a result, more seniors now fall into the middle class — defined in this case between the 40th and 80th income percentile — than ever before.

If you wonder why you are working so hard to get a job, please note that a lot of these guys are sitting on theirs or at least working part-time. (It reminds us of the Onion story: “Parents With More Vacation Time, Financial Resources Want To Know When Son Will Come Home For A Visit.”)

The Times piece shows how a variety of Americans in that sub-generation is faring. Some are struggling, like the rest of us. But between the fancy cruises and fat pensions and gated communities and golf courses and vintage ‘57s Chevys, it’s not a world that younger Americans have any reason to expect. In fact, it sounds like something from a museum of postwar affluence.

So part of us is glad the American middle class will go out with a boom, so to speak. We don’t begrudge these people – our teachers and professors, our older friends, our parents and other relatives – comfort in their gray years. The way Americans, in the days before social security and other protections, lost their footings in old age was simply inhumane. But why couldn’t the prosperity be spread so that those born in the ‘50s, ‘60s, and after can enjoy the same stability and wealth?

Well, this is a complicated one, and we’ll nod to the usual suspects: Globalization, technology, and the depletion of natural resources (especially energy) meant that the postwar boom would not last forever.

But you know what else the original Boomers brought us? Despite their dabbling with progressivism and hippie utopianism, this group served as the shock troops for market-worshipping neoliberalism and the Reagan-Thatcher shift in the ‘70s and ‘80s. They gave us junk bonds and the privatization push and Gordon Gekko. Some of them went into the corporate world and started dismantling.

Let’s hope they enjoy their retirements. But these gray Boomers and grayer Silents – not all of them, but enough to do substantial damage – put forces in motion that mean for the rest of us, the twilight years will be significantly less cozy.

Scott Timberg is a staff writer for Salon, focusing on culture. A longtime arts reporter in Los Angeles who has contributed to the New York Times, he runs the blog Culture Crash. He's the author of the new book, "Culture Crash: The Killing of the Creative Class."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: boomers; economy; jobs; middleclass; waronmiddleclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last
To: dragnet2
Well, we might ask some twentysomethings about their experiences with the economy and how we could get things back on track.

But unless u cn txt th questns 2 thm, or work it into a conversation about the Kardashians or Spider-Man, I wouldn't count on an answer.

161 posted on 06/16/2015 11:41:24 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (Life's a bitch. Don't elect one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

Here’s the question you continue to evade.

Why do you think the American middle class is all but dead on the floor?

Give it a shot.


162 posted on 06/16/2015 11:55:10 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
1 - technology

2 - the fiduciary duty of a company to its shareholders

3 - the desire of Americans of all classes for cheaper stuff

4 - our suffocating tort law system

In no particular order.

163 posted on 06/16/2015 2:31:46 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (Life's a bitch. Don't elect one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

So you admit the middle class is all but dead on the floor. That’s good.

BTW, it seems you conveniently forgot another huge factor. It was government who opted to aid and abet an historic 30+ year endless flood of low wage foreign nations and illegal aliens into the job markets...And it continues as we speak.


164 posted on 06/16/2015 3:33:29 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: MoochPooch
my husband was basically fired so at age 63 he has started to draw SS....

being a nurse, I could work forever...infact, most nurses in the hospital do seem to work late in life...one reason is we don't generally have defined pensions like all the other community minded workers like teachers, cops and firemen...I guess nurses aren't worth it but that's a different story...

fact is, I could no longer be an idle retiree as I could climb Mt Everest...I am not in the brochures and either is my hubby.....

we are not into "pleasure" for simple pleasure and what rocks our boat is accomplishment....goals...something to be proud of...

165 posted on 06/16/2015 4:24:13 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

So, you’re proud of the fact that you’re both going to drain welfare money out of the government and take a job from an able-bodied younger person?

Well combined we’ve payed into the system for almost 90 years that’s hardly welfare and as far as the job there’s few if any younger person that could do it.

Hell I’m just proud I’ve lived this long!


166 posted on 06/16/2015 5:27:15 PM PDT by Dusty Road (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
The illegals aren't making cars, or TV's, or washing machines, or computers.

That stuff's all being made in China/Singapore/Vietnam, or right here using robots.

The illegals are mostly doing menial jobs, or living off the taxpayer.

167 posted on 06/16/2015 5:42:35 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (Life's a bitch. Don't elect one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon
The illegals are mostly doing menial jobs, or living off the taxpayer.

You've just proved you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

They've taken over complete industries such as service industry, restaurants, hotel, construction, manufacturing, machine shops, auto mechanics, fabrication, AC installations, landscaping, alarm install, warehousing, forklift drivers.

These were all once American jobs.

I'm behind enemy lines, I know exactly what talking about Mr. Pode. You clearly do not.

168 posted on 06/16/2015 6:52:23 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: cherry
we are not into "pleasure" for simple pleasure and what rocks our boat is accomplishment....goals...something to be proud of...

Wow, I'm impressed! That's what I want to do -- continue contributing to society as long as I can. Although leisure has its place, even among the young, it should not be the focus or end in itself.

Of course, I am not kidding myself. While I don't see myself playing golf in Florida, I might not be that 90-year-old career woman, either. I am just trying to avoid ending up a 70-year-old on the street with a shopping cart & 100 cats. While I'm sorry to hear about your husband, I might end up in the same situation, given my company & current job market.

Saving for later in life is not a question of retirement, it's survival. While I don't know my future, I doubt it will be elegant. My 401 is essentially the "bag lady fund."

169 posted on 06/17/2015 11:46:55 AM PDT by MoochPooch (I'm a compassionate cynic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson