Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/15/2015 7:31:48 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

M-16 and M1911 variants.
Same old stuff in a very competitive market.


2 posted on 06/15/2015 7:33:29 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

More American manufacturing going down the tubes...such a tradition! If you can’t get a Colt, US made, then where are we heading?


3 posted on 06/15/2015 7:35:40 AM PDT by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

They are very pricy. I think a lot of people cant afford to buy a Colt. They should have moved down south to get rid of Union punishment


4 posted on 06/15/2015 7:39:49 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
The West Hartford, Conn.-based company, with a legacy dating to 17th century New England, developed a pistol it calls “the gun that won the West” and enjoyed a lucrative stretch in the late 1990s and early 2000s as the U.S. military’s sole supplier of the M4 line of firearms widely used by front-line troops. But Colt has struggled in recent years with a slowdown in rifle sales and its 2013 loss of a key contract to supply the U.S. Army with the M4. The company has had accounting problems that caused it to revise prior years’ reported financial results and miss a creditor’s initial filing deadline for an annual report, according to regulatory filings.

PFL

6 posted on 06/15/2015 7:40:47 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

$2095?


7 posted on 06/15/2015 7:41:19 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Colt has definitely priced themselves out of the market. I was in the market for a 1911 (always wanted one) and Colt was WAAAAYYYYY over my budget.

I bought the Remington 1911R1 for just over $700 out the door. I’ve put a couple thousand rounds through it with no issues.

Oh, and it came with a rebate.....200 rounds of Remington hollow points!!!


13 posted on 06/15/2015 7:55:07 AM PDT by fredhead (Join the Navy and see the world.....77% of which is covered in water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

I own numerous Colt firearms and have dealt with their customer service on more than one occasion. IMO their problem was/is that they relied upon the military for their profits and could care less about civilians. My experiences with their rude and incompetent customer service/warranty department are not unique. It’s how they roll. Now they’re paying the price.


14 posted on 06/15/2015 8:03:16 AM PDT by LouAvul (We've been sold down the river, and I can't swim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

I would love to have a Colt 1911, but ended up getting a Rock Island Armory for about 1/3 of the price.


19 posted on 06/15/2015 8:16:49 AM PDT by IamConservative (If fighting fire with fire is a good idea, why do the pros use water?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

I’m sure left-wing extremist law suits had nothing to do with this.


20 posted on 06/15/2015 8:21:24 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Sounds like Colt may have a Left Looney mentality...I am kind of glad they didn’t move, because the more Leftists that these companies move with them to evade unions, taxes, etc, the more Lefties they bring to more red states and they vote their same errors all over again.


21 posted on 06/15/2015 8:21:39 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Colt needs to get back to everyday guns for the civilian market. They made a lot of money doing so and they could again if they met reasonable price points.


23 posted on 06/15/2015 8:40:53 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

They don’t build a 22, the most popular weapon on earth. They barely produce one half assed CCW .380.
They don’t build a 38 snub.
They don’t build a 357 except in a SAA peacemaker.
The don’t build a python though they could sell every one they could build, and still have a 5 year waiting list.
They wont relocate like Remington, ruger, and others have done.
They don’t produce a 9MM service or CCW pistol besides a 1911.
They don’t make any of their classic black powder designs.
For Gods sake they don’t even crank out .38 super 1911s for the Mexican Cartels. That ALONE could probably save them.
They only seek government contracts.

They deserve to cash out.


25 posted on 06/15/2015 9:00:39 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
My local FFL won't carry Colt. They enforce a minimum stocking requirement that is simply too expensive for items that move very slowly. There a plenty of equally good products at lower prices from multiple competitors.
26 posted on 06/15/2015 9:05:29 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
The West Hartford, Conn.-based company, with a legacy dating to 17th century New England, developed a pistol it calls “the gun that won the West”

Uh, that would be Colt's Paterson revolver in 1836, in the 19th Century, and "The Gun that Won the West" was the 1873 Winchester.

28 posted on 06/15/2015 9:07:33 AM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Any gun maker producing in the NE US or West Coast has got a severe case of idiotic logic. A good business knows that you can’t make money in an adversarial environment, especially one that detests the product one makes. Colt and Remington should pick up stakes and move South or to Texas if they wish to remain competitive.


32 posted on 06/15/2015 1:17:30 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

When other companies such as Ruger have ridden the sales boom and made their companies sound, colt concentrated on government and failed.


38 posted on 06/19/2015 8:49:12 PM PDT by KC Burke (Ceterum censeo Islam esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson