Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

I thought this class was to be named after cities


14 posted on 06/12/2015 4:00:06 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

“I thought this class was to be named after cities.”

I liked it a lot better when they stuck with traditions like that. I remember when Rickover departed from the norm of naming subs for fish. He was currying favor from strategic states. When asked about it he replied “fish don’t vote”.


28 posted on 06/12/2015 4:14:59 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

The Navy has a long history of violating naming conventions. For the first six frigtes President Washington was responsible for selecting five of the names: Constitution, United States, President, Constellation, and Congress, each of which represented a principle of the United States Constitution. The sixth frigate, Chesapeake, remained nameless until 1799, when Secretary of the Navy, Benjamin Stoddert, designated her a namesake of the Chesapeake Bay, ignoring the previous Constitutional naming protocol.


34 posted on 06/12/2015 4:23:32 PM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson