Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Supreme Court affirms right to be drunk on front porch
KAKE.com ^ | 06/12/2015 | KAKE.com

Posted on 06/12/2015 12:11:04 PM PDT by GIdget2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: jocon307; Talisker

It is the owner who decides the access. If there is no fence or signage saying otherwise, the starting assumption is private ownership / public access. In this case, the state supreme court has ruled that private ownership trumps public access as it should be.

In essence, the owner can change that designation at any time. If the owner tells someone to leave their property, then the property line becomes the limit of the public access. This is no different than a store owner telling someone to leave the store. The civil rights laws have modified that by asserting a special class of unconstitutional conditions based upon public accommodation.


21 posted on 06/12/2015 12:49:07 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._Jardines

The porch is clearly curtilage, which the Supreme Court has found is less private than the home but more private than private property in general.


22 posted on 06/12/2015 12:54:39 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Private Ownership / Private access = interior of the house

Add all fenced or posted property to that.


23 posted on 06/12/2015 12:56:12 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Yes, see #21


24 posted on 06/12/2015 12:58:21 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
That reminds of the time I missed the step at my old house and my face slid down the stucco wall as I stumbled down to the ground,,, had nasty scratches on left side face for a few weeks.. nope, didn't spill my beer.. I had to tell everyone I had a mountain-biking incident...

I believe this guy was better off than me...

25 posted on 06/12/2015 12:59:18 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
If there is no fence or signage saying otherwise, the starting assumption is private ownership / public access.

For private property, the fact that it's private should mean that it's ALL private unless otherwise indicated, right out to the property line.

26 posted on 06/12/2015 1:33:41 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
A test revealed her blood alcohol concentration at 0.267 percent, more than three times the amount considered drunk for driving.

Why did She even submit to the test?!?!

Furthermore why did the Stupid Cop pull this Unconstitutional move?

And YES I'm calling this cop stupid because he was. Geeze- badge+gun=power trip.

And before ANYBODY starts in- I AM NOT A COP HATER, STUPID ONES ARE A DIFFERENT THING.

27 posted on 06/12/2015 1:37:51 PM PDT by mabarker1 (congress, The Opposite of Progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

In western lands, if you have a large ranch and a county road
runs through it, you have to close the road to the public for
24 hours each year so the county can’t legally assume ownership. One ranch in southern Oregon, 50 miles by 30 miles, has four roads that they close on the same day. Drives
everyone nuts cause you can’t get anywhere.


28 posted on 06/12/2015 1:41:22 PM PDT by OregonRancher (Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Police Officer sees Randal’s “Porch Monkey 4 Life” shirt:

Officer: [shouting] PORCH MONKEY?

Randal Graves: Oh, no no, it’s cool, I’m taking it back.


29 posted on 06/12/2015 2:01:30 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

WORD.


30 posted on 06/12/2015 2:36:03 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I always thought so.....


31 posted on 06/12/2015 2:49:01 PM PDT by rrrod (Just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
"Iowa Supreme Court affirms right to be drunk on front porch"

Whew! What a relief! Now I can consider moving to Iowa.

32 posted on 06/12/2015 2:56:19 PM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The courts have taken the position that the absence of signage or other control (fence) indicates that it is open for public access.


33 posted on 06/12/2015 3:48:51 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
The courts have taken the position that the absence of signage or other control (fence) indicates that it is open for public access.

They have indeed.

34 posted on 06/12/2015 3:50:54 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

My personal belief is that much of the prior jurisprudence comes from the old “open range” grazing and movement of cattle.


35 posted on 06/12/2015 3:56:48 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

A relative of mine in Robbinsdale, Minnesota (Mpls) was given a DUI when walking home from a friends place.


36 posted on 06/12/2015 4:14:02 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

**** It is the owner who decides the access. If there is no fence or signage saying otherwise, the starting assumption is private ownership / public access. In this case, the state supreme court has ruled that private ownership trumps public access as it should be. ****

My signs not only say “No Trespassing” but they also say that “I Will Shoot You” also have signs that say “I Don’t Dial 911”

Local Revenue Enhancement Agents don’t have a problem with the signs, the few times I have had to interact with them they Honk from the street and wait for me to come out to see them, and they ask if they can come into the yard, whether I let them in or not is up to me ... so far its 50/50 ... they have business they better have a Warrant, if they just want to shoot the breeze and drink a beer they get to grab me a cold one from the Ice Chest.
TT


37 posted on 06/12/2015 7:08:50 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Almost forgot ... if they are coming over to shoot the breeze and drink beer, it isn’t mandatory but appreciated that they bring a 12 pack and some ice. (I always do when I go to their place)

I don’t think they ever tire of me calling them “Revenue Enhancement Agents” or they put up with it cause I brought beer.

We never talk shop or Politics, just fishing and gossip about some poor slep losing everything to his EX after 20 plus years... (see it’s mostly commiseration)

TT


38 posted on 06/12/2015 7:16:47 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

They said drunk on porch not dump on porch!


39 posted on 06/12/2015 7:40:26 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
A relative of mine in Robbinsdale, Minnesota (Mpls) was given a DUI when walking home from a friends place.

Minnesota is a Nanny State wannabe. How did they justify a DUI when all the person was doing was driving their feet?

Sure it wasn't public intoxication, or some other horrible crime?

40 posted on 06/13/2015 7:15:45 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson