Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Waiting for Hillary to be charged.......
1 posted on 06/07/2015 9:46:26 AM PDT by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: TaxPayer2000

Yep, still waiting for Hillary to be charged


2 posted on 06/07/2015 9:49:33 AM PDT by GeronL ("NEW ARRIVALS" sci-fi ebook is free this weekend at Amazon!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

So, theoretically if you set your browser to clear it’s history every time you close it, you may be committing a felony over and over again.


4 posted on 06/07/2015 9:54:22 AM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

6 posted on 06/07/2015 9:55:47 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

This law is only for ‘the little people’, the proles, not the ‘Inner Party’, didn’t you get the memo from Big Brother 0.00? Hillary is part of the ‘Inner Party’, here in Oceania.


9 posted on 06/07/2015 9:58:52 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

Well yeah, there’s lots of normal every day stuff that if you do it KNOWING you’re destroying criminal evidence becomes illegal.


11 posted on 06/07/2015 10:02:40 AM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

Prosecuting someone for trying to wipe his internet browser history to cover up a lie he made to the police is not any great stretch of the law. You can also be prosecuted for throwing out your garbage if you know there is evidence of a crime in there that you want to get rid of.

Of course you are free to wipe your email server to cover up anything if you are a democrat candidate for president.


12 posted on 06/07/2015 10:03:26 AM PDT by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

It’s my understanding that just about anything is recoverable from an intact hard drive.

In other words, deleting files or overwriting them is pretty much a waste of time if law enforcement has enough time, money, and equipment to tease those files back out again.

It’s also my understanding that smashing a hard drive into dust and little pieces is the only sure method of destroying the data.

Is my understanding of this issue correct?


17 posted on 06/07/2015 10:10:21 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

The comments to the article go immediately to, “Kill the rich — but only a few hundred thousand of them so we don’t feel icky.”

What’s funnier is the line preceding the comments: “Before commenting, please read our Community Guidelines.”

I guess “economic cleansing” of the 1% fits The Nation’s community guidelines.


19 posted on 06/07/2015 10:11:48 AM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000
Interesting.

I have Firefox configured to forget everything: passwords, history, cache, etc. when it shuts down.

I also use the "secure" option when emptying my trash. It overwrites the file with random data.

A defrag is run automatically every night.

About once a week, a task automatically runs to overwrite all the empty space on my disk drive.

This is all basic security measures, to prevent private information from lurking on my computer in places I don't know about, and to keep it running in top performance.

21 posted on 06/07/2015 10:14:40 AM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

One of these days...One of these days they are going to hit the too much button..


24 posted on 06/07/2015 10:28:28 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (It is not heaven, it is Iowa. Everyone gets a "Corn Check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

Once again, the idiocy of nondiscrimination is demonstrated.

One: “Khairullozhon Matanov is a 24-year-old former cab driver from Quincy, Massachusetts”. No, he’s not “from Quincy, Massachusetts”. He’s FROM Kyrgyzstan. He came on a “student” visa in 2010, dropped out, and later received asylum, I presume by committing perjury. He happens to be living in the United States and consorting with enemy soldiers.

Two: This fact ALONE is sufficient to return him to Bishkek, where there are plenty of mosques for him to pray at. Dropping him from a helicopter hovering over the Gogol Street mosque would provide a salutary lesson.

Three: If the idiot Bush had concentrated on removing Muslims who do not belong here and preventing more from arriving, none of this would be happening. But, because he is an idiot, he took at face value the lying complaints that Muslims living in the US (and taking advantage of our generosity) were a persecuted minority in need of special protection and special favors.

Four: Since it is presumably provable that his asylum case was fraudulent, the whole expensive legal process could be short-circuited by his immediate removal to Guantanamo.


25 posted on 06/07/2015 10:34:21 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000
Here's a little more information about this poor man "from Quincy, Massachusetts".

Of course, it's in the British press, since the US media simply reprints or broadcasts press releases from his lawyer.

While dropping out of Quincy College (an "open admission commuter school" with an "international students program") and driving a cab, he managed to accumulate (or was given) $71 000 which he wired to various overseas locations.

I bet you anything that a proper investigation of this "international students program" and this open admissions junior college would turn up MANY persons of interest.

27 posted on 06/07/2015 10:42:28 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000
"There were three counts for making false statements based on the aforementioned lies and—remarkably—one count for destroying “any record, document or tangible object” with intent to obstruct a federal investigation. This last charge was for deleting videos on his computer"

Anyone unclear on the double standards existing these days?

28 posted on 06/07/2015 10:42:51 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

This guy must have had a terrible lawyer who failed to inform him that he cannot be prosecuted as long as he claims he was only deleting items about yoga and wedding dresses.


32 posted on 06/07/2015 10:52:18 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

This is the Nation, a hardcore Marxist magazine.

Do people not know that anything it publishes is distorted propaganda.


35 posted on 06/07/2015 10:56:13 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

That’s what happened. Hillary Clinton heard that it’s a good idea to periodically clear her web browser and she confused that with web server.


41 posted on 06/07/2015 11:08:31 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

http://www.cybertronsoft.com/products/privacy-eraser/


46 posted on 06/07/2015 11:15:03 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

“You Can Be Prosecuted for Clearing Your Browser History” ...(if you are peripherally involved in a nightmarish terrorist bombing, and after being interview by the police run home and destroy all electronic record of your contact with the leader of the cell)
Such behavior has always been a crime.

Screw this guy.


48 posted on 06/07/2015 11:21:21 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000
But since Sarbanes-Oxley was passed in 2002 federal prosecutors have applied the law to a wider range of activities

As they ALWAYS do with ANY law.

51 posted on 06/07/2015 11:48:16 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaxPayer2000

Prosecutors are probably just throwing this out for leverage to get him to talk. If the case moves forward, then there should be a VERY busy prosecutor in D.C.

HAHA, like that would ever happen.


54 posted on 06/07/2015 12:30:56 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson