Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: US won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq
foxnews.com ^

Posted on 05/28/2015 10:22:22 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

The White House on Thursday, in no uncertain terms, put the onus on the Iraqis to fight and defeat the Islamic State -- even as a new report warned foreign fighters are flocking to the battlefield at a historic and dangerous pace.

"The United States is not going to be responsible for securing the security situation inside of Iraq," Press Secretary Josh Earnest told Fox News.

Earnest defended the administration's strategy, amid growing concerns about gains made by ISIS fighters in both Iraq and Syria. Earnest said the effort would take a "sustained commitment," but stressed that the U.S. will continue to focus on training and equipping Iraqi forces, while backing them up on the battlefield with air power.

"Our strategy is to support the Iraqi security forces in doing what we will not do for them," he said. "The United States is prepared to train them, to equip them, and to back them on the battlefield with coalition military air power as they take the fight to ISIL in their own country."

In saying the U.S. will not be "responsible" for the security situation, the White House was putting clear limits on the lengths to which the U.S. will go to reverse ISIS' gains, even as the Pentagon considers adjustments to the strategy.

Former CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell countered that "it is everybody's fight." Speaking with Brian Kilmeade on Fox News Radio's "Kilmeade and Friends," Morell said the terror group poses a "significant threat to the stability of the entire Middle East."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; isis; obama; obamairaq; obamaisis; obamalosesiraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: RoosterRedux

The president is ISIS’s representative in the US. Why would obie work against his constituents?


41 posted on 05/28/2015 10:56:08 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

That part of the world is barely worth the Plutonium we should drop on them.


42 posted on 05/28/2015 11:00:25 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

As awful as it sounds, the only REAL solution is to destroy the shrine in Mecca.

Surgically.

Mohammed predicted that if Mecca were destroyed, then Islam is not God’s religion, as he said.

But with a warning that if we see *ANY* retaliation against *ANY* American interest anywhere, the next strike will not be so surgical and will include other shrine cities throughout the ME.


43 posted on 05/28/2015 11:03:51 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Advantage Isis...game, set & match...goodbye


44 posted on 05/28/2015 11:04:56 AM PDT by rights with responsibilities (If you like your free speech, you can keep your free speech..if you're careful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: onyx

45 posted on 05/28/2015 11:06:03 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

never happen with obama, hillary, a democrat or a rino anywhere near the white hut ... all (the prior) hate you and your children ... vote them in and find the truth of my words.


46 posted on 05/28/2015 11:06:14 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Do what is Right ... Take This Freepathon Over the Top!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Obama Flashback: 'We're Leaving Behind a Sovereign, Stable and Self-Reliant Iraq'
47 posted on 05/28/2015 11:08:11 AM PDT by McGruff (For Rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

“They wanted us out”

We need to ponder who is “they”.

None of know what’s in the minds of our Middle East strategists. My view is that we make efforts over there only if it is in our security interests. Maybe we can withhold help from Iraq and it will work out ok for us.

Didn’t we leave because the Iraq leader insisted that our soldiers be tried for alleged offenses in their courts? Could it be that if that leader changed his mind, we’d start helping again.

While I recognize my ignorance, I also don’t trust our foreign policy leadership which starts with Obama.


48 posted on 05/28/2015 11:09:46 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“White House: US won’t be ‘responsible’ for ‘security situation’ in Iraq”

Of course not.

It’ll be bushs fault.


49 posted on 05/28/2015 11:15:42 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

You’re the very best!


50 posted on 05/28/2015 11:20:06 AM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
Obama is just imitating the Democrat congress in 1974.

When the Mombasa moonbeam failed to negotiate a remaining security force, the first thing that went through my mind was the Saigon embassy. Only this time, I don't think there will be any helicopters.

51 posted on 05/28/2015 11:20:56 AM PDT by kitchen (The people on the left are enemies, not countrymen with different opinions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Just wow!


52 posted on 05/28/2015 11:21:58 AM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
White House: US Obama won't be 'responsible' for 'security situation' in Iraq

Fixed it.

-PJ

53 posted on 05/28/2015 11:26:52 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Your idea of destroying Mecca is the key to the entire war.
Fight their false religion with its own precepts.


54 posted on 05/28/2015 11:54:20 AM PDT by tractorman (I never miss a chance to tweak a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
"U.S. won't be responsible for security situation in Iraq."

BUT, anything BAD that happens is BUSH'S FAULT!
55 posted on 05/28/2015 12:33:20 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Iraq is gone and there is going to be a bloodbath. And the idiot-in-chief in the White House doesn’t give a rat’s rear.


56 posted on 05/28/2015 12:58:26 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

OK, JUST SO WE’RE CLEAR ON THIS— when the ghastly images of a humanitarian crisis caused by the vacuum of accountable authority hit the news feeds, everyone whose been screaming for us to get out of Iraq are going to remain perfectly content with their choices, and the WH WILL NOT EVER COMMENT on how messed up the situation is or how terrible the conditions have become ... RIGHT?


57 posted on 05/28/2015 1:49:32 PM PDT by owainG31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
This is insane. Either defeating ISIS is in our national security interests or it is not. If it is, we cannot outsource our national security to a corrupt Iraqi government.


58 posted on 05/28/2015 2:57:55 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Except of course, when
there's a Republican
President. Oh, and,
Death to America!"


59 posted on 05/29/2015 6:22:13 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


60 posted on 05/29/2015 6:22:40 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson