Posted on 05/27/2015 8:01:51 AM PDT by servo1969
Most Americans hold either liberal or conservative positions on most matters. In many instances, however, they would be hard pressed to explain their position or the position they oppose.
But if you cant explain both sides, how do you know youre right?
At the very least, you need to understand both the liberal and conservative positions in order to effectively understand your own.
I grew up in a liberal world New York, Jewish and Ivy League graduate school. I was an 8-year-old when President Dwight Eisenhower ran for re-election against the Democratic nominee, Adlai Stevenson. I knew nothing about politics and had little interest in the subject. But I well recall knowing knowing, not merely believing that Democrats were for the little guy and Republicans were for the rich guys.
I voted Democrat through Jimmy Carters election in 1976. He was the last Democrat for which I voted.
Obviously, I underwent an intellectual change. And it wasnt easy. Becoming a Republican was emotionally and psychologically like converting to another religion.
In fact, when I first voted Republican I felt as if I had abandoned the Jewish people. To be a Jew meant being a Democrat. It was that simple. It was and remains that fundamental to many American Jews identity.
Therefore, it took a lot of thought to undergo this conversion. I had to understand both liberalism and conservatism. Indeed, I have spent a lifetime in a quest to do so.
The fruit of that quest will appear in a series of columns explaining the differences between left and right.
I hope it will benefit conservatives in better understanding why they are conservative, and enable liberals to understand why someone who deeply cares about the little guy holds conservative or what today are labeled as conservative views.
Difference No. 1: Is Man Basically Good?
Left-of-center doctrines hold that people are basically good. On the other side, conservative doctrines hold that man is born morally flawed not necessarily born evil, but surely not born good. Yes, we are born innocent babies dont commit crimes, after all but we are not born good. Whether it is the Christian belief in Original Sin or the Jewish belief that we are all born with a yetzer tov (good inclination) and a yetzer ra (bad inclination) that are in constant conflict, the root value systems of the West never held that we are naturally good.
To those who argue that we all have goodness within us, two responses:
First, no religion or ideology denies that we have goodness within us; the problem is with denying that we have badness within us.
Second, it is often very challenging to express that goodness. Human goodness is like gold. It needs to be mined and like gold mining, mining for our goodness can be very difficult.
This so important to understanding the left-right divide because so many fundamental left-right differences emanate from this divide.
Perhaps the most obvious one is that conservatives blame those who engage in violent criminal activity for their behavior more than liberals do. Liberals argue that poverty, despair, and hopelessness cause poor people, especially poor blacks in which case racism is added to the list to riot and commit violent crimes.
Here is President Barack Obama on May 18, 2015:
In some communities, that sense of unfairness and powerlessness has contributed to dysfunction in those communities. Where people dont feel a sense of hope and opportunity, then a lot of times that can fuel crime and that can fuel unrest. Weve seen it in places like Baltimore and Ferguson and New York. And it has many causes from a basic lack of opportunity to some groups feeling unfairly targeted by their police forces.
So, poor blacks who riot and commit other acts of violence do so largely because they feel neglected and suffer from deprivations.
Since people are basically good, their acts of evil must be explained by factors beyond their control. Their behavior is not really their fault; and when conservatives blame blacks for rioting and other criminal behavior, liberals accuse them of blaming the victim.
In the conservative view, people who do evil are to be blamed because they made bad choices and they did so because they either have little self-control or a dysfunctional conscience. In either case, they are to blame. Thats why the vast majority of equally poor people black or white do not riot or commit violent crimes.
Likewise, many liberals believe that most of the Muslims who engage in terror do so because of the poverty and especially because of the high unemployment rate for young men in the Arab world. Yet, it turns out that most terrorists come from middle class homes. All the 9/11 terrorists came from middle- and upper-class homes. And of course Osama bin Laden was a billionaire.
Material poverty doesnt cause murder, rape or terror. Moral poverty does. Thats one of the great divides between left and right. And it largely emanates from their differing views about whether human nature is innately good.
I think liberals would be hard pressed to define why they feel the way they do, other than relying on emotionally based rationales.
Most conservatives I know understand fully why they are conservative.
Simply, in a nutshell.
The following is a collection of definitions of projection from orthodox psychology texts.
In this system the distinct mechanism of projecting own unconscious or undesirable characteristics onto an opponent is called Freudian Projection.
Here projection is assuming that others act or perceive similarly according to this definition it is not necessary for a projected trait to be undesirable or unconscious.
Projection is probably inherent in social animals and the single most important psychological mechanism.
The following are given as examples:
I still have only one friend who is Jewish and a conservative. His daughter lives in Israel. I think that Obama’s Muslim roots and anti-Israel policies pushed him over the edge.
Some liberals want to be controlling. They want to tell others how to live, and what to do. And liberalism is their vehicle to do that.
But most liberals of my acquaintance are not like that. They are liberal because of a childlike desire to help the "underdogs". The irony, of course, is that most liberal policies only worsen the conditions of the underdogs.
We live in a very liberal part of the country and I find that to be the case with most of my liberal acquaintances also. Many of them actually are quite sincere, but it is extremely frustrating how easily they are manipulated by the press and liberal politicians. When one tries to counter with solid facts and figures they are able to parrot leftist talking points with great ease and are generally not willing to hear any opposing view points.
So in essence leftists think people are children and must be taken care of by their enlightened betters (who just happen to be the leftists who hole this position), while conservatives believe people are adults who must beheld responsible for their own actions.
RE “...But I well recall knowing knowing, not merely believing that Democrats were for the little guy and Republicans were for the rich guys. ...”
I recall that fallacy as well.
i can actually save Prager some time here... the short and sweet answer is that liberals see the world through an emotional lens. conservatives see the world through a rational lens. this is the critical difference and why it’s hard to find common ground on most issues.
I’ll cut through the BS and get to the point.
Right is right
Left is wrong.
Not anymore complicated then that............
Yeah, I like that quote from article.
Good stuff from Dennis Prager here. Part I? I will ping out Parts II, III, etc....
Moral Absolutes Ping!
Freepmail Responsibility2nd or wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list. FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search [ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Libs...can't live with 'em, can't kill 'em!
Not exactly; they want the "underdogs" helped at the expense of others who may or may not wish to help.
The left can’t explain anything they believe. That’s why they’re forced to censor debate and name-call.
I’m looking forward to future installments...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.