Call your elected, a NO VOTE on anything connected to U.N. Agenda 21 is their only option!
Posted on 05/25/2015 7:44:15 AM PDT by Whenifhow
EXCLUSIVE: The United Nations Foundation created by billionaire Ted Turner, along with a branch of media giant Thomson Reuters, is starting to train a squadron of journalists and subsidize media content in 33 countries—including the U.S. and Britain--in a planned $6 million effort to popularize the bulky and sweeping U.N.-sponsored Sustainable Development Goals, prior to a global U.N. summit this September. where U.N. organizers hope they will be endorsed by world leaders.
The unprecedented media push is formally intended to start on May 25 but is already underway. It is intended to help breathe some new life into a sprawling U.N. effort--supported by, among others, the Obama administration--to create a global social and environmental agenda for the next 15 years.
It is taking place in parallel with an equally strong but unrelated media cheerleading push by supporters of strong climate change action to help set in stone a new global greenhouse gas emissions treaty at a Paris summit in December.
Snip
Training sessions for the journalists—whose parent organizations are as yet unnamed—are slated to run through August.
U.S. training sessions will take place in New York and Los Angeles, although who will be given instruction—and whose editorial platforms will be subsidized—has not yet announced. Overall subsidies are expected to range between $25,000 and $100,000, with 15 recipients named by the end of May and another 15 by the end of June.
snip
The effort would also include “putting them in touch with people on the ground doing implementation work”--in other words, those who are actually going to put the goals into practice.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
United Nations & Agenda 21 Ping
Please open the link and read the entire article.
Analysis on the video below - Media going into re-education camp to learn how to propagandize Agenda 21.
12:55 Minutes
UN ANNOUNCES IT WILL PAY OFF MEDIA TO SOCIALLY ENGINEER THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA 21.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjOd2IMcng4
...and the prestitutes will be lining up to sell their souls and services.
We need to crush the Godless UN.
And for such an Orwellian, global-state, wealth-destroying goal! How horrible.
of course we have to wonder how much Clinton Foundation money will be sent in the same direction
I’ve been expecting this.
Next, Turner and like minded folks will underwrite big city newspapers that are going the way of the dinosaur.
Seems to me they’ve done that already. Only this time they’ll get cold. hard cash instead of thirty pieces of silver...
No question. People ask how MSNBC still operates with horrible ratings and, thus, poor revenue streams.
Simple. Propaganda stations do not care about ratings, and the revenue comes from government and friendly institutions.
So it shall be for the NYT, WP, and LAT.
“The United Nations Foundation created by billionaire Ted Turner, along with a branch of media giant Thomson Reuters, is starting to train a squadron of journalists and subsidize media content in 33 countries—including the U.S. and Britain—”
They already got an army of journalists that will willingly do this for free.
“in a planned $6 million effort...”
To further enrich all the connected scam artists.
Let me know when it’s time to start forcibly evicting them from our countries.
Anyone familiar with the Communist Constitution of Russia will recognize in the United Nations Charter a similar format. It is characterized by a fervent declaration of democratic principles which are sound and desirable; this is then followed by a constitutional restriction or procedural limitation which completely nullifies the principles just announced. For example, the Russian Constitution provides for universal suffrage and voting by secret ballot. Then, in Article 126, it provides for a single political party (the Communist Party) which will furnish the voters with a single roster of candidates. This, of course renders completely meaningless all the high-flown phrases dealing with universal suffrage and secret ballots. Freedom of the press is likewise guaranteed, and then wiped out by the provision that all writings must be “in the interest of the workers.”Also pointed out in that chapter is Alger Hiss’ role in drawing up the UN Charter. The Stalin Constitution writ large into said charter, and all the ravages it has caused up until now, are part of the record of history.
In precisely this same way, the United Nations Charter provides for “the sovereign equality of all its members” (Article 1)—and then sets up a Security Council, which is dominated by five permanent members (Britain, Russia, China, France and the United States), any one of which can nullify the expressed desires of all other member nations by the simple device of exercising the veto power.
The Charter allows each member nation to have one vote in the General Assembly. This sounds like democracy, but then it provides that the General Assembly can do nothing more than make recommendations, and must refer all of its suggestions to the Security Council for action! (Articles 11-14). This makes the Security Council the only legally binding legislative body in the UN. To make this absolutely crystal clear the Charter provides in Article 24 that any nation which joins the UN must “agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council.” This means that in spite of the bold declaration that the UN is “based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”, the cold fact is that the members are all committed to obey the will of a handful of nations in the Security Council. As the next ten years dramatically demonstrated, all members of the UN—particularly the little nations—could be subjected to the chokehold which the USSR had provided for herself by holding membership in the Security Council and dominating that body through the frequent use of the veto power.
The Charter further provides that membership in the UN shall be restricted to “peace-loving” states (Article 4). This was thoroughly discussed at San Francisco, and Secretary John Foster Dulles has emphasized that the UN was designed to be a collective organization of friendly nations to preserve peace rather than an assemblage of all the nations in the world. In other words, the United Nations was built on the premise that its members would only include those nations which had had a demonstrated history of being “peace-loving.” Eight years after the adoption of the UN Charter, Secretary Dulles explained to the American Bar Association why the United Nations had failed to preserve the peace:“Now we see the inadequacy of an organization whose effective functioning depends upon cooperation with a nation which is dominated by international party seeking world dominion.”As some authorities have since pointed out, the UN provided for a worldwide police commission and then made the top international gangster a member of that commission. It was like setting up a fire department to put out the conflagration of war and then putting the world community’s foremost firebug on the department. From the point of view of the little nations, it was like promising to provide a good shepherd to protect the small, weak countries, and then appointing the wolf and all her pups to protect the flock.
All this became apparent during the “decade of disillusionment” which immediately followed. In 1945, however, a war-weary, hopeful free world felt the United Nations was all it purported to be—an organization for collective security designed to stand like a bastion against aggressor nations. …
— The Naked Communist, Chapter 8
Geez. I wonder who the individual is that owns HUGE swaths of land all over the country. Of course if I had his $$$ I’d own a whole bunch of land too.
Call your elected, a NO VOTE on anything connected to U.N. Agenda 21 is their only option!
Bookmark
Get us out of UN
Get UN out of us.
Call your elected, a NO VOTE on anything connected to U.N. Agenda 21 is their only option!
_________
That includes local officials - and it would be even better to attend local government meetings. We need to make a difference locally.
grindall61 is the author of the video posted at post #2
Channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/grindall61/feed
He was the one who attended the meetings & had a video linked from drudge via Gateway pundit from about two months ago. He has MANY videos about how the local government is currently implementing Agenda 21 in his area of California.
AMERICAN PATRIOTS SHOUT DOWN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION PUSHING TRAITOR REP. LUIS GUTIERREZ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGpVnzOAq9w
Pro-Amnesty Democrat Shouted Off Stage by American Patriots at USC
So much for the free press.
The free press hasn’t been around much for a while, but is certainly gone after congress revoked the Smith Mundt Act in May 2012.
Does a new law make government propaganda legal? | Glenn Beck
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/05/24/does-a-new-law-make-government-propaganda-legal/
Libs were upset too
Is Congress Really Authorizing US Propaganda at Home ...
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/05/congress-propaganda
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.