Call your elected, a NO VOTE on anything connected to U.N. Agenda 21 is their only option!
United Nations & Agenda 21 Ping
Please open the link and read the entire article.
Analysis on the video below - Media going into re-education camp to learn how to propagandize Agenda 21.
12:55 Minutes
UN ANNOUNCES IT WILL PAY OFF MEDIA TO SOCIALLY ENGINEER THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA 21.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjOd2IMcng4
...and the prestitutes will be lining up to sell their souls and services.
We need to crush the Godless UN.
And for such an Orwellian, global-state, wealth-destroying goal! How horrible.
of course we have to wonder how much Clinton Foundation money will be sent in the same direction
“The United Nations Foundation created by billionaire Ted Turner, along with a branch of media giant Thomson Reuters, is starting to train a squadron of journalists and subsidize media content in 33 countries—including the U.S. and Britain—”
They already got an army of journalists that will willingly do this for free.
“in a planned $6 million effort...”
To further enrich all the connected scam artists.
Anyone familiar with the Communist Constitution of Russia will recognize in the United Nations Charter a similar format. It is characterized by a fervent declaration of democratic principles which are sound and desirable; this is then followed by a constitutional restriction or procedural limitation which completely nullifies the principles just announced. For example, the Russian Constitution provides for universal suffrage and voting by secret ballot. Then, in Article 126, it provides for a single political party (the Communist Party) which will furnish the voters with a single roster of candidates. This, of course renders completely meaningless all the high-flown phrases dealing with universal suffrage and secret ballots. Freedom of the press is likewise guaranteed, and then wiped out by the provision that all writings must be “in the interest of the workers.”Also pointed out in that chapter is Alger Hiss’ role in drawing up the UN Charter. The Stalin Constitution writ large into said charter, and all the ravages it has caused up until now, are part of the record of history.
In precisely this same way, the United Nations Charter provides for “the sovereign equality of all its members” (Article 1)—and then sets up a Security Council, which is dominated by five permanent members (Britain, Russia, China, France and the United States), any one of which can nullify the expressed desires of all other member nations by the simple device of exercising the veto power.
The Charter allows each member nation to have one vote in the General Assembly. This sounds like democracy, but then it provides that the General Assembly can do nothing more than make recommendations, and must refer all of its suggestions to the Security Council for action! (Articles 11-14). This makes the Security Council the only legally binding legislative body in the UN. To make this absolutely crystal clear the Charter provides in Article 24 that any nation which joins the UN must “agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council.” This means that in spite of the bold declaration that the UN is “based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”, the cold fact is that the members are all committed to obey the will of a handful of nations in the Security Council. As the next ten years dramatically demonstrated, all members of the UN—particularly the little nations—could be subjected to the chokehold which the USSR had provided for herself by holding membership in the Security Council and dominating that body through the frequent use of the veto power.
The Charter further provides that membership in the UN shall be restricted to “peace-loving” states (Article 4). This was thoroughly discussed at San Francisco, and Secretary John Foster Dulles has emphasized that the UN was designed to be a collective organization of friendly nations to preserve peace rather than an assemblage of all the nations in the world. In other words, the United Nations was built on the premise that its members would only include those nations which had had a demonstrated history of being “peace-loving.” Eight years after the adoption of the UN Charter, Secretary Dulles explained to the American Bar Association why the United Nations had failed to preserve the peace:“Now we see the inadequacy of an organization whose effective functioning depends upon cooperation with a nation which is dominated by international party seeking world dominion.”As some authorities have since pointed out, the UN provided for a worldwide police commission and then made the top international gangster a member of that commission. It was like setting up a fire department to put out the conflagration of war and then putting the world community’s foremost firebug on the department. From the point of view of the little nations, it was like promising to provide a good shepherd to protect the small, weak countries, and then appointing the wolf and all her pups to protect the flock.
All this became apparent during the “decade of disillusionment” which immediately followed. In 1945, however, a war-weary, hopeful free world felt the United Nations was all it purported to be—an organization for collective security designed to stand like a bastion against aggressor nations. …
— The Naked Communist, Chapter 8
Call your elected, a NO VOTE on anything connected to U.N. Agenda 21 is their only option!
Get us out of UN
Get UN out of us.
So much for the free press.
Everything that is going on in the world is tied to the New World order and the new geo-political economic zones. The Agenda 21 is the reason that the European Union does not seriously oppose Putin and the rebuilding of the USSR. It is the reason that Obama and Eurozone doesn’t oppose Iran and the caliphate. It is the reason that Obama is opening our borders to Central America.
The New World Order is intended to be made of geo-political zones of shared responsibility, run by a partnership of elite politicians, academics, business men and bankers. The unions are the enforcers and the rest of us are just the workers, drones. The Statists in WA are on both sides of the political aisle.