Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

Linda’s taped calls had an added complexity if I recall, she was taping phone calls (not a personal encounter) AND there was a squabble that she was in a locale that permitted citizens to tape a call without disclosing it to the other participant while Monica was not.

Some places only require that one of the persons need to know that the call is being recorded.


9 posted on 05/24/2015 3:52:54 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

Yeah, I knew that on Tripp. But for calls, conversations or otherwise, the point is that states do often have laws that control them with regard to one or both party’s knowledge.

The key thing here I think is the law trying to legitimize evidence collected as a result of those encounters.


10 posted on 05/24/2015 3:59:22 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson