I completely disagree with the premise of the story.
I would agree if our country continues on its current track, however because of this debt,something has to change.
And it will.
Denial just ain't a river in Egypt.
however because of this debt,something has to change.
I would agree if our country continues on its current track, however because of this debt,something has to change.
And it will.
I agree.
One third of the land mass of the country is owned by the federal government. Aside from the fact that a mere 5% or so of these lands are sitting on trillions in fossil fuel wealth, much of the lands, and therefore TH ENVIRONMENT, would benefit from private development.
These now public lands could be sold off to private interests without violating their "pristine" qualities, and the budget could have a surplus in about a day.
Public lands are being mis-managed today, from unnecessary forest fires to misuse and abuse, our lands are being "protected" to the point that they simply atrophy from a combination of government neglect and over-regulation.
This country is one big mass of mineral wealth, with a little grass growing on top.
Harry Browne ran for president on this platform many years ago, and I've always thought it had a place in the discussion.