Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I've known the Prince of Wales for very close to fifty years now since he was sent from the UK to attend the same school as me for a while. I've known him well for about seven (reestablishing my relationship with him through his brother). This article is the best I have found at describing the man I know. He is often presented as a caricature in the media, especially by the left-wing press who seem to like caricaturing anybody they know to be conservative, while they also excessively praise about the only issue they agree with him on, his environmentalism, and I really think it gives people an unfortunate and inaccurate impression of the man. Except on his environmentalism - which is a position he adopted before it became a very trendy lefty position - he's actually a conservative on a great many issues who would fit in quite well at Freerepublic if his membership of such a site was not a bad idea constitutionally and politically. He is a Christian (he believes in respecting the beliefs of others, but that doesn't mean he shares them). He is a patriot dedicated to the idea of preserving western civilisation. He is a staunch supporter of the military and of veteran's rights. He is a gun owner and a sporting shooter, who believes such things should be legal. He is utterly dedicated to the idea of following his nation's constitutional laws (including when they put specific limits on him personally). He's no paragon of virtue. He's no genius. He's a decent man who has made some mistakes, he's intelligent and educated, but not brilliant. By accident of birth, he's inherited a role his nation wants preserved, and he does his duty as he is asked to do.

I don't know if he will be a good King - I don't know if anybody can know that. I do know that he will try his best to do his best, as he has always done when he had been told he has a duty.

1 posted on 05/21/2015 6:44:01 PM PDT by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

Thank you for that.


2 posted on 05/21/2015 6:47:44 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
He criticizes the "education experts" who he feared were turning children into "better robots," rather than fully capable and enquiring human beings.

That is an encouraging insight, at odds with today's preference for well-trained serfs over educated citizens.

3 posted on 05/21/2015 6:51:40 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
"In the 1980s, he compared the result of modernist architects unfavorably to the Battle of Britain. "You have to give this much to the Luftwaffe: When it knocked down our buildings, it didn't replace them with anything more offensive than rubble," " Can you deny he is right? Look at this monstrosity...
4 posted on 05/21/2015 7:02:47 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Bump


5 posted on 05/21/2015 7:03:02 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Good post..


6 posted on 05/21/2015 7:05:18 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Certified Islamophobe..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

He comes across well in the excerpts from the letters that I have read.


8 posted on 05/21/2015 7:18:42 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Thank you for posting.


9 posted on 05/21/2015 7:19:03 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Thanks for the note. We’ve talked about your thoughts on this before, and I’m glad for the opportunity.

There have been things that bothered me about Charles, but they seemed to be fairly straightforward things I wouldn’t respect about anyone else, so I haven’t been focused unfairly or unreasonably on him.

I like the way Britain is set up. I wouldn’t like it here, but I respect the way they handle things there concerning the royalty. The had a royalty in the past, and it keeps the tradition alive.

As for Charles being a nature lover, many of us are. We aren’t stark raving mad like the Left in the U. s. is, but we value nature, animals, and reasoned sustainability. We just aren’t mentally disturbed about it.

I don’t see Charle’s as displaying unreasoned interest in the environmental issues touched on here.


12 posted on 05/21/2015 7:26:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
You are the first person who has written about the Prince, that I have read, that does not have an agenda. Accordingly, I will change my opinion of him. I have always wondered about who he really is, because we only read about him through the filter of people who do have an agenda.

I know good people who have made terrible decisions, but they do not have their names drug through the press.

I do not agree with a lot of his opinions, but I also disagree with my brother even more.

14 posted on 05/21/2015 7:49:56 PM PDT by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I didn’t know you knew the Prince. Good post naturalman. :)


15 posted on 05/21/2015 7:51:04 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Disgusting man!


17 posted on 05/21/2015 7:59:11 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Thanks for your post.


20 posted on 05/21/2015 8:20:08 PM PDT by IncPen (Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I was disturbed when he said that he would be Keeper of the FaithS... plural. I know that he must tread lightly, but how can he lead the UK (even as a figurehead) without being concerned that the increasing Muslim population and push toward Sharia from common law will destroy the essence of western civilization and Britain as we know it. He’s the ultimate infidel no matter how much he gives in to them.


21 posted on 05/21/2015 8:40:02 PM PDT by MHT (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

All right, so Prince Charles isn’t a bad sort, though he can be a bit of an odd duck on topics such as Islam & I wonder what HRH thinks of Anjem Choudary and the Rothenham horror.

I wish the bloody tabloids would leave him and Camilla strictly alone; they make each other happy & that’s all that should matter to anyone.

The issue of succession is up to Parliament and not the Queen, so let that matter rest until the time comes. There are far bigger fish to fry especially concerning the Islamics so let’s attend to their shenanigans first.

Deporting at least half the muzzie bastards would be a good start; off topic, but if Charles wishes to back a cause that would rally most of England behind him, that’s where to begin, surely.


23 posted on 05/21/2015 9:12:57 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I am sorry but it is sad that he is all in when it comes to the Global Warming scam. You would think that he would have the ability and common sense to look into why satellite data shows that the Earth hasn’t warmed for nearly two decades despite rising CO2 levels.


24 posted on 05/21/2015 10:50:35 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

WOW! You give me new hope for Great Britain. you have any idea his views on Islam? Thank you


26 posted on 05/22/2015 1:54:57 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

thank you for this. i always thought of him as a wanker, but your personal experience means I must re-evaluate


27 posted on 05/22/2015 2:07:00 AM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

Thank you!


29 posted on 05/22/2015 5:32:21 AM PDT by ottbmare (the OTTB mare, now a proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
The latter assumes that the possessor of a property is entitled to extract all its market value, even if it destroys the use of that property and its goods for all posterity.

No capitalist would destroy the use of his property and its goods. A socialist would be much more likely to do that. Since he doesn't own it, what would he care?

30 posted on 05/22/2015 7:48:46 AM PDT by BfloGuy ( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I read somewhere that when he is crowned he will chose George as his name.


31 posted on 05/22/2015 7:49:27 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson