Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mother of ten children by FIVE fathers now wants 50 grandchildren to keep benefits rolling
Daily Mail ^ | 5/19/15 | Robinson

Posted on 05/19/2015 9:23:21 AM PDT by pabianice

Mandy Cowie, 49, is given around £22,000-a-year in state handouts

She wants her children to have five babies each so she can be supported

She said: 'Ten kids and full of tattoos mate. So what if I'm on the effing dole mate - don't like it, eff off'

On Channel 5 show her children also brag about milking benefits system

A single mother with ten children from five different fathers has said she wants 50 grandchildren so they can become Britain's biggest benefits family.

Mandy Cowie, 49, who is given around £22,000-a-year in state handouts, believes encouraging her own children to have babies means she will be supported for life.

Ms Cowie, who has used the cash to cover herself in £2,000 of tattoos, has lived on benefits herself for three decades and her own children have been following the same jobless path.

In a TV show set to be broadcast tomorrow, her children proudly describe the intricacies of the system so they can milk as much cash from the state as possible.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: lurk

Indeed. She and her ilk are quite evil. They lounge and live off others - many who are still working for not much pay above what it takes to meet their housing and food needs, utilities and medical needs.

She and others like her steal that disposable income from these people. They steal higher educations, vacations, educations, general life improvement and inheritances, and they steal dreams that haven’t even been dreamt most of all.


41 posted on 05/19/2015 10:32:10 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Yes......it was a brain fart....thank you for saving me from a faux pas of the nth order.


42 posted on 05/19/2015 10:33:52 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I see that on Jerry all the time. Twerk that booty...


43 posted on 05/19/2015 10:34:29 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Blame it on Spall Czech ...


44 posted on 05/19/2015 10:36:50 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Thought about it, but scruples made me admit the truth. :0)


45 posted on 05/19/2015 10:37:37 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

;’}

#41 is well said, but it’s bigger than that.

The whole welfare state enterprise is evil. The politicians who create it, the bureaucrats who run it, and the bums who live off of it all conspire to rob their countrymen at gunpoint. Socialism is hideous.


46 posted on 05/19/2015 10:42:06 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

It’s not ‘evil’ to the politicians and bureaucrats. It is ‘votes.’


47 posted on 05/19/2015 10:47:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
It’s not ‘evil’ to the politicians and bureaucrats. It is ‘votes.’

And a paycheck. And that's the problem. They create evil, and do evil, and don't even know what evil is. They're so mired in evil they can't recognize it.

48 posted on 05/19/2015 10:49:47 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Agree


49 posted on 05/19/2015 10:53:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
Your tagline: "If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law."

Your solution for Ms. Cowley and her progeny: "Kill them. They are vermin."

Bit of a disconnect there.

To makee things worse, in the net 10 years something like a third to a half of the low-to-medium skill jobs will be replaced by robotics. Hugely MORE unemployed and unemployables in this woman's social class; and not just in "her class" either--- across the board. More unemployables who used to be in the skilled trades--- college grads too.

Whet do you do then, sitetest? Go in for extermination in an even bigger way?

50 posted on 05/19/2015 10:55:54 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When I grow up, I'm gonna settle down, chew honeycomb & drive a tractor, grow things in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

How does she get a “jobseekers allowance”?


51 posted on 05/19/2015 10:57:27 AM PDT by gnickgnack2 (QUESTION obama's AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Leech!


52 posted on 05/19/2015 10:58:45 AM PDT by Duckdog (If it wasn't for NASCAR my TV would have gone out the window years ago!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
So, think a few steps forward: the men are then going to turn away from entire generations of sterile women and high-quality virtual-reality Oculus-porn, and decide instead to become married, monogamous and responsible, and have what they always wanted: kids to support?

Because men have to get married if there's going to be a responsible marriage-and-family culture.

Why would they?

Your solution (lots, lots, lots more Norplant and IUD's) only contributes to the further disintegration and decay of anything even vaguely resembling a human culture --- as opposed to what you'll find in the oozy bottom of a never-cleaned garbage can.

53 posted on 05/19/2015 11:08:08 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When I grow up, I'm gonna settle down, chew honeycomb & drive a tractor, grow things in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Yep...sick.


54 posted on 05/19/2015 11:15:39 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Well said.


55 posted on 05/19/2015 11:23:38 AM PDT by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Subsidizing the broken families (and those who are on welfare are almost never married) does not help society.

Ending the subsidies for more fatherless children will incentivize proper family formation, even if it simply means curtailing the growth of a socially broken underclass so that married women have a lower financial burden and can afford more children.


56 posted on 05/19/2015 11:28:24 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

She’d make a heck of a bouncer.


57 posted on 05/19/2015 11:53:12 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
I didn't write in favor of them being subsidized. I wrote against them being sterilized. The natural function of their bodies is not "the problem," and the breakdown thereof will not be "the solution" --- it will only ruin humanity in other ways.

It's like thinking marriage is helped by contraception. I was once witless enough to believe that: but that was 40+ years ago when I was a teenager. One of the main things contraception has done is destroy the marriage culture.

In 1965, the nonmarital birth rate in our own black underclass was something like 1:4, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan was vilified for saying it was a "crisis" and the "disintegration" of the black family.

Moynihan, of course, was right.

Now the nonmarital childbearing rate is 1:4 for Whites --- and for Hispanic 2:3, and for Black 3:4.

What's destroying family-formation is not lack of contraception.

58 posted on 05/19/2015 12:09:16 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When I grow up, I'm gonna settle down, chew honeycomb & drive a tractor, grow things in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Criminality is now so deeply entrenched in the British system that the crooks take it for granted.


59 posted on 05/19/2015 12:16:51 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Dear Mrs. Don-o,

"Bit of a disconnect there."

Not really. I'm all about protecting innocent life.

One way to protect innocent life is to eliminate the guilty.

This woman is guilty.

Sadly, her once-innocent children, to the degree that they decide to participate in her fraud, become guilty.


sitetest

60 posted on 05/19/2015 1:29:50 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson