Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia to Unveil Aircraft Super-Carrier Design Amid Navy Buildup
The Moscow Times ^ | May. 15 2015

Posted on 05/15/2015 9:11:55 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

A Russian naval design bureau will unveil a new design for a massive aircraft carrier at an upcoming maritime defense industry show in St. Petersburg amid a major Russian arms buildup, magazine IHS Jane's reported Friday.

Known as the Project 23000E, or Shtorm-class, super-carrier, the design by the Krylov State Research Center appears similar to one teased by Russian Defense Ministry television channel TV Zvezda earlier this year.

The unveiling, which is planned for the International Maritime Defense Show 2015 in early July according to IHS Jane's, will come as Russia pushes forward with a 20 trillion ruble ($400 billion) decade-long rearmament program through 2020 intended to revamp the country's armed forces and restore the Russian navy's ability to project power abroad.

“The Project 23000E multipurpose aircraft carrier is designed to conduct operations in remote and oceanic areas, engage land-based and sea-borne enemy targets, ensure the operational stability of naval forces, protect landing troops, and provide the anti-aircraft defense,” Krylov State Research Center deputy director Valery Polyakov told IHS Jane's, a specialized defense industry publication.

The new super-carrier would likely be part of a future armament program, as Russia's shipbuilding industry is currently unable to take on such a project, and the navy's near term strategy is to build up its fleets of smaller vessels.

Weighing in at 100,000 tons, the Shtorm-class is significantly larger and more capable than Moscow's only current aircraft carrier, the 43,000 ton Soviet-built Admiral Kuznetsov.

The scale of new carrier would rival that of the U.S. super-carrier fleet and be one of the world's largest warships — which has raised doubts over Russia's ability to construct such a vessel.

Like every Soviet aircraft carrier before it, Kuznetsov was constructed in the Nikolayev 444 shipyards, located in Ukraine. Russia does not have shipbuilding capacity for a vessel larger than 60,000 tons, experts told The Moscow Times earlier this year.

According to Polyakov, the proposed aircraft carrier will have a length of 330 meters, a width of 40 meters, and keel depth of 11 meters and a top speed of 30 knots, IHS Jane's reported.

Though Zvezda reported that Krylov's design would be powered by a nuclear reactor, Polyakov said the version of the design to be shown in St. Petersburg will run on convention diesel fuel. The design could be tweaked to fit a nuclear system if necessary, he said.

In 2011, Russia also commissioned two 16,500 ton French Mistral-class helicopter carriers for its fleet, but France froze the deal last year over Moscow's actions in Ukraine.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; carrier; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: GeronL

Where is Russia getting all the money to build this. I have read that some of these things are pipe dreams. Like Hitler looking at his magnificent city as the bombs were dropping.

How many carrier groups do we have?

And I don’t know if 600 BILLION is really cutting back.

Could go a lot further without graft and waste.


21 posted on 05/15/2015 9:30:11 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

It’s not the dollars, it is what you get for them


22 posted on 05/15/2015 9:33:59 PM PDT by GeronL (NEW ARRIVALS -> 99 cents buy here: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/541331)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
and 25% of their crew should be unqualified women and another 25% should be sexual perverts too

just to make it fair

Did they have a layout of where the Vodka distillery is on the ship?

23 posted on 05/15/2015 9:35:06 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

and there probably is one too


24 posted on 05/15/2015 9:35:43 PM PDT by GeronL (NEW ARRIVALS -> 99 cents buy here: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/541331)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

saferooms and teddy bears


25 posted on 05/15/2015 9:36:10 PM PDT by GeronL (NEW ARRIVALS -> 99 cents buy here: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/541331)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

No, stands for Sh** Storm, because anything Russian made is going to be a whole lot of Sh**!


26 posted on 05/15/2015 9:38:29 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
and there probably is one too

I figure there has to be one in the plans, they would never be able to find enough Russians that weren't alcoholics to man it.

27 posted on 05/15/2015 9:38:54 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I guess Russia and China didn’t get that message that aircraft carriers are obsolete


28 posted on 05/15/2015 9:39:42 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
OK, that's nice.

Can they afford the rest of the task group and the replenishment ships that are needed to keep this thing from being a VERY expensive artificial reef if the balloon goes up?

"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

29 posted on 05/15/2015 9:42:28 PM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
An Aircraft Carrier and it ships are a formidable force against an adversary that is not technologically advanced. Our Aircraft Carries in combat against Russia or China will be sunk as surely as theirs will be sunk by us. They can send a few nukes by their aircraft but those aircraft will have no ship to land on after their mission.

That is just the way it is.

30 posted on 05/15/2015 9:43:56 PM PDT by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

Right now they can’t even build large ships, they have to have someone build them for them, so the expectation date for this theoretical ship is what, to be completed in 15 or 20 years theoretically?


31 posted on 05/15/2015 9:46:14 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
AMEN!!! I've read the f35, I think it's called, cant hold a candle to the A10. I'm not a military guy, but I know the soldiers love the A10. Do they serve the same purpose? or is the f35 something new and special? I don't know.

We should have a SICK military for 600 billion a year!! I hope we do. I know we are not paying the soldiers enough. Need that money for newborn illegals and welfare recipients. /s for those who don't know me by now

32 posted on 05/15/2015 9:46:57 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why don’t they just ask Obutthole if they can buy one from us?


33 posted on 05/15/2015 9:56:53 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Ruskies draw pretty pictures.


34 posted on 05/15/2015 10:12:11 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

F35 and A10 fulfill different roles. A10 is ground-based and designed for ground attack, chiefly tank busting. F35 is ground or ship-based and designed for multiple purposes.


35 posted on 05/15/2015 10:14:13 PM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

thanks. But if we are planning on getting rid of he A10, what will the new tank buster be?


36 posted on 05/15/2015 10:17:49 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
I am not aware of a new tank buster that is planned to replace the A10. However, some other multi-role aircraft can perform the ground attack mission.

The A10 was designed long ago with the main intent of devastating Warsaw Pact armored formations in central Europe. Since the likelihood of such an invasion is now deemed unlikely, a dedicated tank buster is deemed unnecessary.

37 posted on 05/15/2015 10:29:30 PM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Power loves a vacuum.

Obama VS Putin

38 posted on 05/15/2015 10:31:17 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Aircraft carriers are obsolete, as were our battleships in 1941.


39 posted on 05/15/2015 10:33:09 PM PDT by Cry if I Wanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
But if we are planning on getting rid of he A10, what will the new tank buster be?

Tanks are obsolete.

40 posted on 05/15/2015 10:36:17 PM PDT by Cry if I Wanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson