Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrea Zopp Decides To Run For Kirk's Senate Seat
NBC Chicago ^ | May 15, 2015 | Mary Ann Ahern

Posted on 05/15/2015 4:48:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: StoneWall Brigade; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; PhilCollins; hockeyfan44; fieldmarshaldj; yongin

God, she’s ugly. RuPaul’s sister perhaps?

I presume she’ll have teacher’s union and Black support, but the rat nominee is still likely to be Tammy “The Asian Roseanne Barr” Suckworth, she’s who the DSCC will back.


21 posted on 05/15/2015 9:15:00 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Zopp? Is she from Zeta Reticuli or something?


22 posted on 05/15/2015 9:52:54 PM PDT by DemforBush (Ex-Democrat, and NotforJeb. Just so we're clear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatriotWave; Impy
>> It’s just kinda odd to hear a “conservative” such as yourself say they will be voting for someone as liberal as Tammy Duckworth. <<

Just curious, PatriotWave, did you lecture all the conservatives in South Carolina who openly said they were voting for the RAT over Lindsay Graham (as opposed to saying they were staying home or voting third party, which you label as voting for the RAT anyway)?

I don't recall any of the Kirk apologists here on the Graham threads screaming about how we MUST re-elect Graham over a Dem because we need him to get a GOP majority, or lecturing SC freepers with comments like "he would be a much more reliable conservative vote than the democRAT alternative considering that person would vote conservative 0% of the time".

And it should be noted that Graham on his worst day is STILL more conservative than Kirk on his best day. People talk about what a dirty fithy uber-RINO scumbag Graham is, but I don't recall Graham ever worshiping Planned Parenthood or gloating about an "F" rating from the NRA like "moderate" Mark Kirk does.

Ah, but its "different" because Kirk's "the best we can get" in a RAT controlled state, right? News to conservative U.S. Senators like Al D'Amato (elected in New York State), Pat Toomney (elected in Pennsylvania), and of course, the man who immediately preceeeded Obama in the Senate, Peter Fitzgerald (elected in Illinois, running as a Reagan Republican). If only those foolish GOP "purists" had nominated RINOs in those states instead of "unelectable" types like Fitzgerald, right?

23 posted on 05/15/2015 10:54:05 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Impy; StoneWall Brigade; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; hockeyfan44; fieldmarshaldj; yongin

I’m glad that at least two Democrats will run in that primary. If Duckworth was the only Democrat, in that race, some Democrats would have voted in the republican primary to that they could vote for Kirk. Since Duckworth has a primary opponent, more Democrats will vote in the democrat primary, and the conservative Republican will get a higher percentage.


24 posted on 05/16/2015 6:17:02 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; PatriotWave; AuH2ORepublican; hockeyfan44

I firmly believe Kirk is not the best we can get. He is however certain to be the nominee unless his health takes a turn. Joe Walsh, if he runs, isn’t gonna beat Kirk and would be dead meat in the general, not because he’s a conservative, but because he’s a weak candidate that was lucky to get elected to Congress in a GOP landslide year. No one else, like Ron Wallace, is even worth talking about. Kirk’s main primary opponent last time was a joke, Hughes. No one who could have won dared to cross the combine (or the NRCC who I’m sure didn’t want a primary fight).

A conservative who can win in IL needs to be a strong candidate, Roskam could do it, he ain’t gonna run though unless Kirk is forced to withdraw.

I’m gonna vote for Kirk and that’s my recommendation.

But I won’t lecture anyone to vote for Kirk because it would undermine my efforts to get people to vote for Republicans that are actually good conservatives despite getting smeared by morons, like Pat Roberts, that are perfectly fine despite getting compared to Satan, like Mitch McConnell, or are perfectly acceptable given the circumstances, like Scott Brown. People like Kirk and Collins and Lisa Murkowski don’t belong in our party. But I’m not gonna let some 100% liberal ugly feminist *itch win and put the rats closer to control. My other representation is Dickie Turban and #1 illegals lover Luis Gutierrez, Kirk a least votes the way I like some of the time.

Those that skip the race or vote third party, I respect your conscience not allowing you to vote Kirk.

However I have a problem with anyone who openly roots for or God forbid says they SUPPORT and will vote for the democrat. I would ban anyone from this site for saying they’re voting for Alison Grimes for example.

As for Kirk’s chances, dare I proclaim myself a much better judge of them than people that say “That RINO IS toast (because I don’t like him and freepers like me are obviously an accurate representation of the average Illinois voter)” but I’d put them at 50/50. He shouldn’t need that much crossover to win and since, despite claims to the contrary, Republican’s are favored to keep the Senate, certain elements in this state might prefer to keep a foot in the majority (this will be the #1 target of the DSCC though, national democrats don’t give a F what the combine wants, they want the majority back and need this seat to do it).


25 posted on 05/16/2015 6:18:39 AM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins; StoneWall Brigade; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; hockeyfan44; fieldmarshaldj; yongin; ...

Regardless of the circumstances, I don’t foresee many democrats giving up their vote for their party’s Presidential candidate and their local officials in order to prop up Mark Kirk against primary challengers that no one thinks can come close to beating him anyway.

In fact it would make more sense for them to vote FOR a weak challenger to Kirk, because that would guarantee a rat win.

Rat crossover is a problem in Republican states, like Mississippi where the democrats knew the Republican primary winner would be the heavy favorite. Democrats have a 50% chance to beat Kirk and a 100% chance to beat Ron Wallace or Joe Walsh, they don’t need to be concerned with our primary.

Any rats that do vote in our primary will probably be looking to influence our Presidential nomination, not the Senate race. In that vein, I’m glad there will a fight on the rat side, also because it will hopefully weaken them. I hope it’s a real catfight.


26 posted on 05/16/2015 6:33:11 AM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Impy; StoneWall Brigade; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; hockeyfan44; fieldmarshaldj; yongin

I thought that some IL Democrats might not care about their presidential primary, since they’ll assume that Hillary will win the nomination. She gets about 80%, in many polls.


27 posted on 05/16/2015 7:18:33 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

Yeah, it may all be over on the rat side by the time we get to vote, but maybe it won’t be.


28 posted on 05/16/2015 7:22:36 AM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Impy; StoneWall Brigade; BillyBoy; PhilCollins; hockeyfan44; fieldmarshaldj; yongin

If Kelly and Harris run as well, then the black vote will be split three ways and Duckworth will waltz (well, wheel) to the nomination. I hope that neither one gets in and Zopp and Duckworth have a bloody primary.


29 posted on 05/16/2015 9:43:24 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy; BlackElk; Dr. Sivana; hockeyfan44; BillyBoy

I have no dog in this fight. Nothing but a Combiner pissing match between leftists. I wish them all an ignoble defeat.


30 posted on 05/16/2015 9:53:22 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PatriotWave

Please show me where I said I was going to vote for Tammy Duckworth. I’m not going to vote for either Kirk or Duckworth.


31 posted on 05/16/2015 3:54:35 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy

Robin Kelly has decided not to run.


32 posted on 06/13/2015 6:36:13 AM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson