[kevkrom]

Not UVA. This particular person, who was in the story by name and was essentially portrayed as they story's true villain as the "establishment figure" who tries to get "Jackie" to not make a big deal over the incident.

All of which was complete B.S. They even used a doctored photo of her.

Of all the possible plaintiffs, she actually has the best case because she was directly and personally identified. There was enough ambiguity over the identities of the others in the story that proving damages will be more difficult for them.

[Tzimisce]

But it says the UVA is suing, not this Dean as a private person.

It doesn’t matter. The whole case is so upside down, one has a hard time keeping track of any of the ins and outs.

It’s just more Obamaland: where up is down, right is wrong and perpetrator is the victim.