Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz: Not All Republicans Back Religious Liberty
National Review ^ | May 9, 2015 | Joel Gehrke Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/418161/cruz-not-all-republicans-back

Posted on 05/10/2015 9:58:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Greenville, S.C. — Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas) signaled a new line of attack on Republican rivals, arguing that not all of his rivals defended religious liberty when Indiana passed a Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

“Indiana was a sorting moment, as Reagan would say, a time for choosing,” Cruz said at the South Carolina Freedom Summit. “There are candidates running in 2016, even candidates in the Republican field, who when Indiana was being battled, they were nowhere to be found. I can tell you this, when it comes to standing for the religious liberty of Americans, I will always, always, always stand with the First Amendment.”

Cruz refused to name the Republicans he had in mind, during a press availability following the speech, and insisted that he would take the “high road” during this campaign.

“I do think it’s perfectly legitimate to focus on records,” he said. “I’m a big believer in Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment, ’thou shalt not speak ill’ of another Republican. Now, to be clear, Reagan did not say ‘thou shalt not have policy differences with another Republican.’ Remember, Reagan primaries Gerald Ford — a sitting Republican president — in ’76 and almost beat him.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2015 9:58:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In before the Walker guys start attacking.

Oh wait, that’s right, it’s the Cruz Contingent that goes to Walker threads and starts attacking Walker.


2 posted on 05/10/2015 10:11:18 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Is Ted Cruz himself as mean-spirited as the FR 'Click-it or Tick-it' Cruz Contingent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Cruz has been remarkably gracious to other candidates, although he has not been given the same courtesy. He rises above the fray on substance and character. He was the clear favorite according to those quoted at yesterday’s Freedom Summit and according to all five S.C. straw polls.


3 posted on 05/10/2015 10:20:32 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
In before the Walker guys start attacking

The only so called republican I would never vote for is not running (Romney) - there may be others, I haven't finished sorting them out yet.

4 posted on 05/10/2015 10:27:03 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

whispered slanders and rumor...

Ted, if you have a serious accusation to make bring it forward and stop hiding behind a quote from President Reagan.


5 posted on 05/10/2015 10:40:45 AM PDT by CharleysPride (non chiedere cio che non si puo prendere -- Charlie Daniels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

[It’s the Cruz Contingent that goes to Walker threads and starts attacking Walker.]

Give and take on candidate positions is a mainstay in American history. Somewhere along the line people have forgotten the art of discourse.

We have a duty, a responsibility to voice our approval and opposition to future leaders. To accuse those who have boned up on their candidate and can pick apart their opponents of “attacking” either means they have an inferior candidate or have not done their duty to effectively persuade others to their side.


6 posted on 05/10/2015 10:49:06 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Your pop up same ole, same ole schtick on multiple threads is tiresome.


7 posted on 05/10/2015 11:44:39 AM PDT by Guenevere (If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do........Psalms 11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CharleysPride; E. Pluribus Unum
Ted, if you have a serious accusation to make bring it forward and stop hiding behind a quote from President Reagan.
Cruz will leave it for others to check the public record and determine which Republican candidates made statements about the Indiana and Arkansas confrontations against religious liberty by Democrats and big business.

Many will recall that Indiana's Governor Pence caved on the issue shortly after Cruz had issued his unambiguous statement of support shown below:

CRUZ: I’m proud to stand with Gov. Mike Pence, and I urge Americans to do the same
03/30/15

Issues Statement on Religious Freedom Restoration Act

HOUSTON, Texas — U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, issued the following statement today in support of Governor Mike Pence’s effort to defend religious liberty and protect against the government forcing individuals to violate their deeply held beliefs:

“I want to commend Governor Mike Pence for his support of religious freedom, especially in the face of fierce opposition. There was a time, not too long ago, when defending religious liberty enjoyed strong bipartisan support. Alas, today we are facing a concerted assault on the First Amendment, on the right of every American to seek out and worship God according to the dictates of his or her conscience. Governor Pence is holding the line to protect religious liberty in the Hoosier State. Indiana is giving voice to millions of courageous conservatives across this country who are deeply concerned about the ongoing attacks upon our personal liberties. I’m proud to stand with Mike, and I urge Americans to do the same.”

https://www.tedcruz.org/news/cruz-im-proud-to-stand-with-gov-mike-pence-and-i-urge-americans-to-do-the-same/


8 posted on 05/10/2015 11:47:51 AM PDT by Unmarked Package (Cruz to Victory 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

He has learned the fine art of heaping hot coals of kindness on his rivals.


9 posted on 05/10/2015 11:50:14 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package
Keeping focused on the OP, Senator Cruz is clear in giving his strong position in defense of religious liberty, and others should give their own clear stands... or are they also afraid of doing that?
TWB
10 posted on 05/10/2015 11:55:27 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin, the Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

You mean pointing out his record? The problem with Walker people is that they simply REFUSE to admit that Walker has flipped on key issues...


11 posted on 05/10/2015 11:56:40 AM PDT by TNMOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

“He has learned the fine art of heaping hot coals of kindness on his rivals”.

Excellent description!


12 posted on 05/10/2015 12:06:48 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TNMOUTH; Balding_Eagle

I think we would all be better off if we would just talk up the candidate we back and refrain from taking shots at the others.


13 posted on 05/10/2015 12:53:38 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red; TNMOUTH; Balding_Eagle
I think we would all be better off if we would just talk up the candidate we back and refrain from taking shots at the others.

1. How dare we tell the truth about the candidates others are supporting?!?!? How uncouth of us!!
2. Quit with the dishonest labeling.
3. You, and I, have every right in the vetting of candidates leading up to and during the primaries to discover the truth about every candidate. It's part of the process.
14 posted on 05/10/2015 2:41:01 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

15 posted on 05/10/2015 2:44:30 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Telling the truth is not the same as taking shots.


16 posted on 05/10/2015 3:35:36 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Oh, please.


17 posted on 05/10/2015 4:55:58 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
Telling the truth is not the same as taking shots.

Then we agree!
18 posted on 05/10/2015 9:37:36 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Same on every thread. CW marching orders? lol


19 posted on 05/10/2015 9:58:14 PM PDT by MaxMax (Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS, Make them talk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

My original point was that I do not think it is constructive to jump onto a thread about one candidate who is opposing a candidate I favor and make snarky comments. And I myself have been guilty of such, and I am trying to resist the temptation to continue to do so.

It is perfectly legitimate, however, to post actual refutation of a statement about a given candidate’s stand/policy on certain issues if one can supply references.

Far too often, we — including me — just make a nasty remark about the guy instead of outlining how or why he is wrong about this or that issue.


20 posted on 05/11/2015 6:36:02 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson