Posted on 05/10/2015 5:31:31 AM PDT by SJackson
Geraldo, O’Reilly & Trump certainly have one thing in common, they are notorious WINDBAGS!
Neither am I, but as Pam Geller has pointed out, all you have to do to be a target is not be Moslem. She really is making a statement about free speech, not about Islam per se.
Oh wait, never mind.
It seems to me that most of Geller’s critics are Catholics who should be suspected of seeing the outlawing of insults to Islam as an opportunity to outlaw insulting Catholicism.
Well, that’s an interesting perspective.
I think it’s anti jew.
Lots of hard core libs hate Jews and hate religion.
The fact that muslims are cutting off the heads of christians and jews is fine with them.
They want to see the demise of both.
They fail to see good and evil.
They see Islam as the underdog.
The reason they support islam is because it’s a vehicle to slap christians and jews that are the majority in their home country. They don’t see Islam as a threat because it’s not a majority, yet.
Those guys on December 16, 1773. were egging the King on by throwing all that tea in the bay - they were asking for it!
To all those who have not seen this, and do not support abridging the 1st Amendment to protect innocent mulsims from becoming (more) enraged ... who are not afraid of their muslim betters and masters to be ...
Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
I think a lot of libs identify with muslims in their hatred of christianity.
They see themselves and muslims as victims of Christianity.
They see Christianity as a powerful bully that needs a beat down. They blame it for all the world’s problems.
They don’t see any good in it.
“Hopefully he’ll allow it to stay on his website. “
Yeah, because O”Gasbag might cut off his gig on “The Factor.”
I saw that photo fifty years ago! Soon it became known that the MSM, in reporting it, used a VERY YOUNG high School photo of her. She was forty when she was murdered.
BTTT
Thank you!
This is what I posted right after O’Reilly dared to say what he said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3287490/posts
I'll save you a click.
No, Mr. O’Reilly, the issue is whether a religion, cult, or out of control government should be given the power to dictate whether We the People are allowed to mock the said, religion, cult or out of control government without being sentenced to death.
That sir, is Freedom.
The enemedia couldn’t care less about free speech. Nothing new.
"...don't you think the joker laughs at you?"
Or just bruto-African
Straw-man alert. Double straw-man, because the original response was a straw man, as is the premise of the whole thread.
Viola Liuzzo wasn't Pam Geller, and Pam Geller isn't leading a civil-rights movement against an oppressive Islamic state. To draw parallels between completely different women working on different political projects is a bad premise, compounded in this case by the introduction of straw men constructed as flashy ad-homs.
Just leave it alone and stick to the subject. This isn't Jim Crow Mississippi we're talking about.
FWIW, I agree with Pam Geller. A lot.
To steal a line from Mark Steyn, "No you wouldn't."
Then let's add for emphasis, "Not now! Not ever!"
You're all hair an no brains, eh Donnie?
Great column on Bernie’s part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.