Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Didn’t he confess? oh well. I guess the jury are the only ones that heard everything and they made the wisest decision possible with their superior intelligence and wits/
yeah, I know. But i’s better than a dictatorship.


2 posted on 05/08/2015 1:54:59 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dp0622

11 of the jurors thought he was guilty.


3 posted on 05/08/2015 1:55:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622
Didn’t he confess?

He did, but sometimes confessions are coerced by the police, or manipulated out of mentally-troubled people. (Some of the recent cases where convicted people were freed because of DNA evidence involved confessions that turned out to be untrue.) Aside from the confession, there was zero evidence against this guy-- no physical evidence, no witnesses. Had I been on that jury, I might have voted to convict, but I would have thought long and hard about it first.

6 posted on 05/08/2015 2:02:49 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622

Yes, he did confess. He’s a nut. The family knows who the real murderer is - he’s been serving time for years. The jury did the right thing.


10 posted on 05/08/2015 2:15:52 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson