Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/06/2015 5:38:33 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...

Sorry, Mike: it’s not hard to explain about crooked politicians.

Ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 05/06/2015 5:39:25 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The Clinton Foundation received money in exchange for access and action by Secretary Clinton.

Next.


3 posted on 05/06/2015 5:40:17 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Well, then, everything is OK and Hillary will make a fine president. This, from the vaunted Fourth Estate, guardians of the truth, protectors of the public interest: the sleazeball liberal media (I know, liberal is redundant)


4 posted on 05/06/2015 5:41:19 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

5 posted on 05/06/2015 5:41:22 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Yep, it seems the left always relies on the “complexity” of their scandals to slide them by the public without political consequence.


6 posted on 05/06/2015 5:41:33 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

“She’s on the take” - there explained it with four simple words.


7 posted on 05/06/2015 5:42:15 AM PDT by GotMojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

8 posted on 05/06/2015 5:42:22 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

“Foreign Governments paid Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to do what they wanted” sounds pretty quick to me.


10 posted on 05/06/2015 5:42:53 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Corruption. Gotcha beat. One word. Synonymous with Clinton.


12 posted on 05/06/2015 5:44:03 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Hillary is bought and paid for.

Not that hard


13 posted on 05/06/2015 5:44:10 AM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Maybe Barnicle's plagaristic peabrain can't digest the facts on the crooked clinton foundation's actions in under 120 seconds, but 6% of the gross take sent to the poor isn't hard to grok around here.

Then again, there are no paid media whores covering for Hilary Fat Ass Cankles around here, either.

15 posted on 05/06/2015 5:49:07 AM PDT by W. (Many Disqus sites, Cheezburger.com and [The Internet] Archive.org all censor conservative comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It is up to any potential Democrat candidates to take her out because the Republicans will be too “Gentlemanly” and concentrate their criticism to other Republican during the primaries.

If she is the Democrat nominee, she will be elected, thanks to the Low Information Majority.


17 posted on 05/06/2015 5:51:31 AM PDT by Tupelo (I feel more like Philip Nolan by the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Anyone else remember the beautifully-made graphics showing the relationships between the various players in Watergate that took up two-thirds of the broadcast time of the typical MSM evening news program back in 1973 and 1974?

The patient explanation of exactly who was Donald Segretti, Alexander Butterfield, G. Gordon Liddy, the Plumbers, the Committee to Re-Elect the President? Who Bebe Rebozo was? Who Robert Abplanalp was?

Why do I remember these names after more than 40 years?

Because even though it was impossible to explain Watergate quickly, the MSM sure as hell found time to do it.

18 posted on 05/06/2015 5:51:32 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I think it's his job to explain things in ways us little folks can understand. Since he is having trouble, I'll help

Companies and governments paid Bill to get certain things done. Then Hillary used her position as Sec of State to do those things.

Sure it's more complicated. But anyone who knows the accusations should be able to either call them lies or sum it up that simply.
19 posted on 05/06/2015 5:51:35 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
....claim that the shady dealings described in Clinton Cash, officially out today, won't hurt Hillary much because they're too hard for Americans to understand most people aren't paying attention, don't care and are historically and politically ignorant.

There, fixed it.

20 posted on 05/06/2015 5:51:44 AM PDT by Envisioning (4.13.15 - That awkward moment in history when 53 million racists became sexists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Barnicle is a corrupt journalist who got caught twice posting columns with material written by others. Likely there were a lot more plagiarist pieces which he got away with. He finally got the heave ho by of all enterprises, the Boston Globe which is chock full of lying editorials, commentators, and bias unparalleled.

His rantings are completely unworthy of consideration.

21 posted on 05/06/2015 5:55:07 AM PDT by Radix ("..Democrats are holding a meeting today to decide whether to overturn the results of the election.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
His reasons why it won't hurt Mrs. Bill may be fanciful but itwon't hurt Mrs. Bill. The Clintons are the Kennedys of this period. They are royalty and can do no wrong. Their shenanigans are just proof that they can Get things Done. Liberals and Northeasterners especially, are royalists at heart and believe deep down in a monarchy, hoping all the time that the King or hereditary dictator will be a Wise King.
23 posted on 05/06/2015 5:57:26 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; MinuteGal; Jim Robinson; RedMDer

What we need is a pithy two minute cartoon giving a quick synopsis. Entertaining and informative.

Are there freepers with those talents ?ayne even using JibJab?


24 posted on 05/06/2015 5:57:48 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Barnicle should have spent some time trying to explain the scandal ("They enriched themselves in exchange for political favors.") rather than all the time it took him to come up with this explanation.

And Barnicle is a known plagiarist. So, I'm wondering whose idea this really was...

25 posted on 05/06/2015 5:59:36 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The problem is not that it is complicated or difficult to explain. The problem is that most Americans are ignorant effin morons who get what little “news” they get from corrupt ersatz journalists that worship criminals.

We may as well face facts. “Idiocracy” could be thought of as a [rather crude] modern version of Atlas Shrugged, sincere apologies to Ayn Rand. Spend a week immersed in contemporary pop culture, which in truth is the only culture we have now, and you will have to admit we are there now.


26 posted on 05/06/2015 6:01:02 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson