Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
Yes, and there's more to this than the glaringly obvious aspect of the lack physical abilities and endurance for females to perform to the same level as men in combat roles.

The larger and more damaging factor is the fact that men, real heterosexual men, trained from birth to protect women, will default to this position over all other mission considerations. In addition, there will inevitably be all sorts of "love triangular drama" infecting the ranks. This will lead to breakdowns in unit combat effectiveness and be a causal effect of failure and defeat.

Of course, the whole purpose behind feminizing and anything goes sex freaking of our military is to weaken it to such a state that it becomes completely ineffective against any threat.

29 posted on 05/04/2015 10:59:13 AM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TADSLOS

bump


30 posted on 05/04/2015 11:00:05 AM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson