It’s harsh, it’s hectoring, it’s that hideous Chicago accent and she makes no attempt to correct it. Margaret Thatcher was told her voice was too high-pitched and she sought out voice teachers to help her. One advantage the faux Indian has over Clinton is her soft-spoken approach.
This is also inaccurate as she mentions that no one has a problem with Ted Cruz’s voice. Well, I do. It is high-pitched and nasally and he needs to work on it as well. I spoke to someone who knew him and he said that he never would. So, while I would happily vote for him, his voice drives me up a wall. There. I’ve said it.
Now just a bleepin second.
That "accent" is no accent. The language of broadcasters and airline pilots.
-— One advantage the faux Indian has over Clinton is her soft-spoken approach. -—
When she gets wound up, she’s just as bad. We had to suffer through her campaign here in MA. She can REILLY come across like a nagging school marm.
Hey, I resemble that remark! In fact, I probably have a bit more of a Chicago accent that she does. I grew up in the city, just a few miles east of her suburban home in Park Ridge. Hillary is about five years older than I am.