Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

If there is indeed “no evidence”, then I guess we can remove that government edict that holds vaccine developers immune to lawsuit due to adverse effects of its vaccines (those pesky actuarial infinitesimal debilitations directly caused by them), huh?

They play benefit/loss games and in the end they don’t give a crap if one out of a million dosed patients have their futures destroyed. And, to keep the profit making developers comfortable, they lend cover. Simple as that, even when that actuarially infinitesimal number gets bothersome.


22 posted on 04/25/2015 7:34:08 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
Well, no, the vaccine law does not grant immunity.

It created a fund and a claims process to pay off claims if they are found meritorious. Some are, because vaccines do have side effects and they can sometimes be severe. But nothing like the "epidemic" that's claimed.

The problem is that -- like the "John Doe" raids in WI -- the process is the punishment. A full dress products liability trial will cost upwards of $100,000 in attorney fees and expert witness fees. When plaintiffs' lawyers jump on the bandwagon and, say, a couple of hundred or a thousand plaintiffs sue, it can put a company out of business from the costs alone - even if the company wins the case.

58 posted on 04/25/2015 10:28:24 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson