Why the heck should federal Head Start money depend on whether a state ratifies a child support treaty? I guess legislatures only to get to vote on treaties when the Obama regime has already decided how they should vote.
To: reaganaut1
OH well to bad why do we need international child support regulations and way.
To: reaganaut1
I guess the NYT doesn’t understand what a sovereign state is.
3 posted on
04/21/2015 5:50:50 AM PDT by
SolidRedState
(I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
To: reaganaut1
I thought our Constitution forbid the individual states from entering into treaties with foreign governments?
4 posted on
04/21/2015 5:50:57 AM PDT by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: reaganaut1
Shouldn't it scare everyone when the federal government holds remission of taxes back to the states hostage to what it wants done?
This is why centralization of tax revenues with the federal government is bad policy. Minimizing what the federal government gets reduces such concern.
5 posted on
04/21/2015 5:52:05 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: reaganaut1
A ‘CHILD SUPPORT TREATY’ ?????? Have other states gone along with this???
11 posted on
04/21/2015 6:25:16 AM PDT by
goodnesswins
(I think we've reached PEAK TYRANNY now.....)
To: reaganaut1
Why the heck should federal Head Start money depend on whether a state ratifies a child support treaty? I think if this was litigated, SCOTUS would slap this down. The Feds can make the child support enforcement money contingent upon the state passing the legislation, but they can't make other federal funds that are unrelated to child support contingent upon the state passing it. That is coercion, and SCOTUS already slapped down the Obama administration for that in the Medicaid expansion case.
12 posted on
04/21/2015 6:39:49 AM PDT by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: reaganaut1
Killing Head Start would be great in any case. The entire child support Enterprise was designed not for scofflaws, but to allow the Fed government to intrude in everyone’s life. Good for Idaho!
14 posted on
04/21/2015 6:50:06 AM PDT by
antidisestablishment
( Everyone is equal in the state of desperation. GOP delenda est!)
To: reaganaut1
“Child support” flows from failed marriages destroyed by Liberalism and Feminism.
The CS deck being totally stacked against young men in courtrooms all over this land and against all races defines WHY marriage is all but dead statistically and in the minds of “thinking” young men.
15 posted on
04/21/2015 8:03:01 AM PDT by
Cen-Tejas
(it's the debt bomb stupid)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson