Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Negotiated at The Hague, a Child Support Treaty Falters in Boise
New York Times ^ | April 21, 2015 | KIRK JOHNSON

Posted on 04/21/2015 5:38:16 AM PDT by reaganaut1

POST FALLS, Idaho — It took five years for negotiators to work out the details of a multinational treaty on child support that would make it easier to track delinquent parents around the world. It took only a couple of minutes for a committee of the Idaho Legislature to endanger America’s participation.

In a 9-to-8 vote in the closing hours of the legislative session, the House Judiciary, Rules and Administration Committee killed a bill that state and federal officials had said was crucial to the finely crafted choreography of the child support treaty reached at The Hague. All 50 states must approve the mechanics of the treaty for American ratification to proceed, and 19 have signed off thus far.

A major factor seems to be Idaho’s ornery streak, the part of the state’s identity that does not like the federal government — or, worse still, foreign governments — telling it what to do.

In Boise, the state capital, members of the committee — which is dominated by Republicans, as is the Legislature as a whole — raised concerns about foreign tribunals, perhaps ones based on Shariah, the Islamic legal code, potentially making decisions under the treaty that Idaho might not like. At least 32 countries, along with the European Union, have ratified the agreement.

...

Federal officials said that $16 million in funding for Idaho’s child welfare system would be cut within 60 days, effectively dismantling the state’s child support enforcement arm, which can take steps like garnishing a parent’s pay. Another $30 million in block grants could dry up too, including federal money for Head Start, the preschool program for low-income children.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: federalism
Why the heck should federal Head Start money depend on whether a state ratifies a child support treaty? I guess legislatures only to get to vote on treaties when the Obama regime has already decided how they should vote.
1 posted on 04/21/2015 5:38:16 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

OH well to bad why do we need international child support regulations and way.


2 posted on 04/21/2015 5:41:35 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I guess the NYT doesn’t understand what a sovereign state is.


3 posted on 04/21/2015 5:50:50 AM PDT by SolidRedState (I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I thought our Constitution forbid the individual states from entering into treaties with foreign governments?
4 posted on 04/21/2015 5:50:57 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Shouldn't it scare everyone when the federal government holds remission of taxes back to the states hostage to what it wants done?

This is why centralization of tax revenues with the federal government is bad policy. Minimizing what the federal government gets reduces such concern.

5 posted on 04/21/2015 5:52:05 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
I thought our Constitution forbid the individual states from entering into treaties with foreign governments?

It does. This is not a treaty with individual states. It is a treaty between the United States and other nations. But, in order for the United States to sign on to the this particular treaty, it had to get buy in from all 50 of the individual states.

Good for Idaho. Now the fed screwed up and showed what a brutal master it's become. Taking away other money as coercion to get Idaho to sign on. Like threating to not send highway money to states all these years for not agreeing to speed limits or DUI limits.

6 posted on 04/21/2015 5:59:08 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

That is, “remittance,” not “remission.”

i need my coffee.


7 posted on 04/21/2015 6:03:51 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Was the treaty ever ratified by Congress? I haven’t seen any reports of it.


8 posted on 04/21/2015 6:07:47 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Was the treaty ever ratified by Congress? I haven’t seen any reports of it.

By the way it's being reported, I'd say Idaho has derailed it before it ever got to Congress. I think the buy-in from the states had to come before Congressional ratification.

9 posted on 04/21/2015 6:09:22 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

I think I read that too. Still seems extra-Constitutional to me. But what do I know, I’m just an engineer.


10 posted on 04/21/2015 6:12:17 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

A ‘CHILD SUPPORT TREATY’ ?????? Have other states gone along with this???


11 posted on 04/21/2015 6:25:16 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think we've reached PEAK TYRANNY now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Why the heck should federal Head Start money depend on whether a state ratifies a child support treaty?

I think if this was litigated, SCOTUS would slap this down. The Feds can make the child support enforcement money contingent upon the state passing the legislation, but they can't make other federal funds that are unrelated to child support contingent upon the state passing it. That is coercion, and SCOTUS already slapped down the Obama administration for that in the Medicaid expansion case.

12 posted on 04/21/2015 6:39:49 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
I think if this was litigated, SCOTUS would slap this down. The Feds can make the child support enforcement money contingent upon the state passing the legislation, but they can't make other federal funds that are unrelated to child support contingent upon the state passing it. That is coercion, and SCOTUS already slapped down the Obama administration for that in the Medicaid expansion case.

If this is allowed to stand and establish precedent, look for gun control to be next on the menu.

13 posted on 04/21/2015 6:44:53 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Killing Head Start would be great in any case. The entire child support Enterprise was designed not for scofflaws, but to allow the Fed government to intrude in everyone’s life. Good for Idaho!


14 posted on 04/21/2015 6:50:06 AM PDT by antidisestablishment ( Everyone is equal in the state of desperation. GOP delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“Child support” flows from failed marriages destroyed by Liberalism and Feminism.

The CS deck being totally stacked against young men in courtrooms all over this land and against all races defines WHY marriage is all but dead statistically and in the minds of “thinking” young men.


15 posted on 04/21/2015 8:03:01 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson