I don’t follow any of your reasoning there.
Walker has an entire state to run. Cruz has a staff.
I like them both but the executive edge is clearly in Walker’s favor.
Based on your logic, the liberal governor of California has better experience than Cruz.
As I said, it doesn't matter. I'll keep sending my time and money to Cruz. Not Walker.
And Cruz has changed the dialog of the primary at this point, like it or not, he has moved it to things that conservatives, not always republican, want.
/johnny
Cruz also ran the Solicitor Generals Office in Texas with 4000 employees and 700 lawyers. Supervising 700 lawyers had to be like herding cats!
Cruz also know how to deregulate by his experience in the Fedural Regulatory Commission.
I thought Walker was courageous on unions until I found out he only targeted those that hadn’t supported his election and gave others, like the Public Safety Unions, a pass.
There are a lot of other issues with Walker. You might find the Red State article, “Twelve Reasons Not to Vote for Scott Walker” enlightening. I went down the list and researched every issue. It was spot on.