Based on your logic, the liberal governor of California has better experience than Cruz.
As I said, it doesn't matter. I'll keep sending my time and money to Cruz. Not Walker.
And Cruz has changed the dialog of the primary at this point, like it or not, he has moved it to things that conservatives, not always republican, want.
/johnny
I understand what I need to understand.
I will give more support to an executive of state more than I will a representative of state.
Why you think moonbeam is on my list is quite stupid.
There is no need to claim that I support any moonbat.
And Cruz has changed the dialog of the primary at this point, like it or not, he has moved it to things that conservatives, not always republican, want.I am right there with you, brother.
I well remember the example back in 1987 when a friend of then VP GHW Bush asked him to take several days off at Camp David developing his plans for a prospective presidency, to which Bush replied dismissively and in exasperation, "Oh, the vision thing." That's how an administrator thinks, not a great leader.
One thing that the last 6+ painful years of Obama has taught me is a vision of governance can advance an agenda without benefit of executive skill to back it up; a terribly destructive agenda in the case of Obama. This is a huge change in thinking for me considering, for 45+ years of voting, executive experience has been near the top of my list for POTUS qualifications.
Reagan had the unwavering "vision thing" to rebuild a demoralized, economically damaged nation and great good came from his guiding principles.
Ted Cruz has the vision, developed from his upbringing and over his lifetime, to reclaim our Constitution and Bill of Rights to return the nation to Rule of Law. At this perilous point in our history, we need a trustworthy leader with a resolute ideology and a record of doing what he promises to rein in the oppressive federal government.
My time and money are committed to Ted Cruz.