Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blinded by laser-armed cops – scared yet? (Demilitarizing? Not so fast! Police on buying binge...)
WND ^ | April 17, 2015 | Leo Hohmann

Posted on 04/17/2015 9:44:39 PM PDT by Perseverando


The Z-Ro Retinal Obfuscation weapon mounted to a handgun.

Last summer’s riots in Ferguson, Missouri, prompted much talk by President Obama and certain members of Congress about the need to demilitarize local police forces. Nearly a year later, the opposite is happening.

New and more powerful weapons are flowing into local police departments daily, and still others are new to the marketplace.

One weapon about to make its debut is the “Z-Ro Retinal Obfuscation” gun. When fired, the gun allows an officer to temporarily blind his targeted subject for up to 15 minutes.

The new “compliance weapon” made a splash at the Urban Shield trade show last October in Boston. It is not yet available for purchase but recently entered the manufacturing stage, according to its maker, Reno, Nevada-based Shield Defense Systems LLC. It can be weapon-mounted or hand-held.

“We are currently developing and manufacturing numerous proprietary technologies, don’t be left behind,” the firm says on its website. “Contact us now to be on the priority list for information and demonstrations at info@shielddefensesystems.com.”

The company refers to “recent controversies” in making its pitch for the sight-stealing gun, and says the weapon is safe to use against humans.

“With the rise of recent controversies directed at law enforcement officers … Shield Defense Systems has dedicated its personnel and resources with primary objectives in providing non-lethal and less-harmful but effective, deployable defense systems to proactively subdue would-be assailants. Our systems focus on the PRESERVATION OF HUMAN LIFE, and POST QUALITY OF LIFE, while delivering effective compliance techniques to quell both foreign and domestic threats.”

John Whitehead, a constitutional lawyer, founder of the Rutherford Institute and author of the new book, “Battlefield America: The War on the American People,” finds

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: battlefieldamerica; cnsf; dhs; donutwatch; efad; facebook; google; homelandsecurity; laser; lawenforcement; policestate; robot; ruthefordinstitute; stingray; tyranny; urbanshield; whitehead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: DemforBush

It’s something that is usually associated with exposure and power. Lots of power for a brief period could blind permanently, but so could less power, with longer exposure.


21 posted on 04/17/2015 11:00:26 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
I was wondering about that, too. I’m not a physicist, but it seems to me if something is powerful enough to blind you for 15 minutes, I would think it’s powerful enough for there to be a chance to cause permanent eye damage.

I'd better go back and reread the article, but somehow I don't think Obama's militarized law enforcement agencies will really be concerned about our ability to read small print after we are lased.

A temporarily blinded person is just a better target of opportunity.

Psst... (They really aren't re-education camps, so you won't be up late studying for final exams.) /sarc.

22 posted on 04/17/2015 11:03:40 PM PDT by Perseverando (In Washington it's common knowledge that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible to be POTUS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
I am a NRA sharpshooter (w/ 1 bar), and an Army expert marksman. When I was a young lad, I could reach out and touch you at 600-700 yards easy, with a semi auto rifle (can't see that far now). Full auto sucks, unless you intend to spray and pray. Full auto is for amateurs.
23 posted on 04/17/2015 11:06:43 PM PDT by Do the math (Doug)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Gal

Have ‘em stop in San Francisco. They’d be dealing with the same type of peoples...


24 posted on 04/17/2015 11:17:03 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

And what do you wanna bet that the gov’t protects those DHS / DARPA funded weapons manufacturers from liability lawsuits when these weapons cause injury during domestic citizen control use?
FYI: brief exposure to culminated light from a small laser printer can cause Permanent retina damage.
Can’t imagine how they are making this temporary blinding laser weapon safe?
I insist that before this is deployed for public use, Every company employee, their family members, and government LEOs undergo full dosage testing of the weapon in order to demonstrate how safe this weapon is!


25 posted on 04/17/2015 11:22:57 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

That’s fk’d up...


26 posted on 04/17/2015 11:25:28 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando
The pistol on the table appears to be an FN FiveSeven. The ammo certainly looks line 5.7x28.
27 posted on 04/17/2015 11:54:40 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo trust-government.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


28 posted on 04/18/2015 12:09:13 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I would be concerned that these weapons could be used by criminals ... Could blind a truck driver hauling dangerous goods or blind a robbery victim


29 posted on 04/18/2015 12:37:58 AM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Do the math

Try saying that to a GI who came up against an MG 42.

Look closely at the barrel changeout as well as the perspective from the target’s point of view.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N59msUnyy1g


30 posted on 04/18/2015 1:52:17 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

They are a bigger threat to Americans security and freedom than ISIS.

Thank you Jorge el Segundo and Obozo.


31 posted on 04/18/2015 1:52:23 AM PDT by ZULU (Je Suis Charlie. . GET IT OBAMA, OR DON'T YOU??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Looks like it to me also.


32 posted on 04/18/2015 1:54:23 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Texas Gal

I’ve read that some place before,,,

?


33 posted on 04/18/2015 3:36:02 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

And stock up on laser pointers.


34 posted on 04/18/2015 5:34:46 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

All cops are not bad, as you are probably really saying. It doesn’t take all cops to be bad to endanger us. All it takes is what we’ve got, a few, maybe more than a few, really dangerous, bad apples and a whole lot of cops who aren’t averse to forcing the citizenry into servitude. After all, it feels GOOD to be on the stronger, winning side. Like Terminus (The Walking Dead reference) Cops often do just what they want and throw their weight around, even if they’re not “bad” cops. Try and question if they demand you do something they want you to do, that is without reason, without legal meaning, and see what happens.


35 posted on 04/18/2015 5:48:55 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Never in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

36 posted on 04/18/2015 6:08:29 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Within a year thugs will have these blinders and be using them to mug their victims.

No way this technology is restricted to LEOs.


37 posted on 04/18/2015 6:18:48 AM PDT by G Larry (Hillary Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1
Equipment like this is the product of our litigious society. The lawyers and policy makers are constantly looking for the perfect device that will not inflict permanent damage, keep police from getting injured in the line of duty, and avoid lawsuits. Combined with a plethora of DHS grants, these people go for every sales pitch for every "shiny new object" that comes down the pipe.
38 posted on 04/18/2015 6:34:28 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

When people look at the budget of DHS they have to recognize two things: First, is the scope of how far DHS goes, Coast Guard to FEMA to Border Protection. Second, is the grant funding put into the budget. Combine those two things with the current state of congressional funding and you have a perfect storm for blowing huge sums of money to support donors.


39 posted on 04/18/2015 6:39:01 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Haven’t seen that with Tasers although you do see a fair amount of contact electric stun weapons out there. Too many people watching movies.


40 posted on 04/18/2015 6:41:29 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson