Skip to comments.
Chris Christie calls for 'the right balance' on gun rights
poltico.com ^
| 4/15/2015
| Adam B. Lerner
Posted on 04/16/2015 11:10:26 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: rktman
The right balance sir is to follow the law. You know that pesky thing caled the US Constitution..............
41
posted on
04/16/2015 12:27:36 PM PDT
by
SECURE AMERICA
(I am an American Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
To: DoughtyOne
That doesnt mean that I dont think the Tenth applies in other good ways. I dont believe it precludes the government being right about ruling that pot is illegal. So you are willing to support fedgov's illicit use of the Commerce Clause when you agree with the policy. That is trashing the 10th Amendment.
Thus, I do not believe that space is blank.
It is as blank for the 10th as Christie's version is for the 2nd.
42
posted on
04/16/2015 12:27:54 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: rktman
43
posted on
04/16/2015 12:28:01 PM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
To: DoughtyOne
Ken, to be honest Im not a supporter of legal weed.The ratio is now 60% for legalization, 40% against. Colorado is proving there is no downside, and the cartel crime went elsewhere. It is a states rights issue. The feds need to legalize it and let the States decide.
Keeping it illegal is a losing proposition for politicians. More so every day. Cartel growers in national forests kill trespassers. Coloradans grow it in legal businesses. I know which I prefer.
44
posted on
04/16/2015 12:31:21 PM PDT
by
SpeakerToAnimals
(I hope to earn a name in battle)
To: rktman
This from the man who is governor of a state with some of the most anti-gun, ant-self-defense laws in the entire country.
45
posted on
04/16/2015 12:32:11 PM PDT
by
WayneS
(Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
To: rktman
It’s been a long time since New Jersey passed the point of balance.
46
posted on
04/16/2015 12:34:08 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: rktman
Christie is a one issue pony. He is good on the fiscal issue. That is not sufficient qualification to make him ever acceptable or electable as a President of the United States.
47
posted on
04/16/2015 12:38:08 PM PDT
by
Ohioan
To: rktman
Nothin about hunting in the constitution. Go stuff yourself, lardass.
48
posted on
04/16/2015 12:56:42 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Whenever I find myself in a conundrum, I ask myself: What would Elvis do?)
To: rktman
Balance? Sure, let’s compromise, “public safety” vs “shall not be infringed”: we’ll concede to a 5-minute NICS check window for retail sales (ensure not adjudicated felon or incompetent), in return for elimination of GCA/NFA/922(o) and all hindrances to “constitutional carry”. Those whom courts have individually decided are a danger to the community if armed are denied arms in accordance to that adjudication, and everyone else retains their rights uninfringed (there being no reason to deny the individual right of RKBA to those for whom there is no adjudicated, much less articulable, reason to deny).
...oh, they won’t accept that? TS.
49
posted on
04/16/2015 12:58:40 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
To: Ken H
Thanks for your thoughts Ken. I don’t believe you’re right, but you’re welcome to your opinion.
If you were right, no drugs could be deemed able to be denied to the public reasonably by the federal government. I don’t buy into that premise.
50
posted on
04/16/2015 1:16:34 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
To: SpeakerToAnimals
Guys, I was honest with you, but I’m not going to have this conversation for literally the hundredth plus time.
I appreciate your willingness to set me straight, but I’m too busy today to play along.
Take care.
51
posted on
04/16/2015 1:17:54 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
To: rktman
Fogettaboutit, Fatboy.
52
posted on
04/16/2015 1:26:52 PM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
To: rktman
The right balance starts and ends with “...shall not be infringed”.
53
posted on
04/16/2015 1:29:55 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
To: rktman
Right balance is SHALL NOT INFRINGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is your stinking balance!
54
posted on
04/16/2015 1:41:32 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Call the left what they are - regressive control-freaks)
To: DoughtyOne
If you were right, no drugs could be deemed able to be denied to the public reasonably by the federal government. I dont buy into that premise. So you support the Wickard Commerce Clause.
55
posted on
04/16/2015 2:15:53 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: rktman
Christie is a POS.....and a Fat one at that.
56
posted on
04/16/2015 3:59:47 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: rktman
I really hope this egotistical tub of lard gets in the race; hopefully he can suck some of the air, money, votes, food, drink, desserts, etc. away from Jeb!
57
posted on
04/16/2015 4:01:39 PM PDT
by
zzeeman
("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
To: Triple
58
posted on
04/16/2015 4:03:19 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: rktman
South Park was right about Joysey.
59
posted on
04/16/2015 4:08:12 PM PDT
by
The Toll
To: rktman
Eff you Crispy. Have a donut and STFU!
60
posted on
04/16/2015 4:10:16 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson