Former Obama Pilot: TWA Flight 800 was not blown up by a faulty fuel tank.

NY Daily News ^ | 4/15/15 | Andrew Danziger

[moehoward]

I’ve always been surprised they didn’t try to blame the Cole on an “exploding fuel tank” too.

[Goreknowshowtocheat]

Exactly.. the truth does not have a govt stamp, but true nevertheless.

[exit82]

But since we never heard of any proof of a blast pattern from an exploding warhead of known small SAM systems, I don't believe the theory of a missile shooting down the plane.

If the FBI controlled the investigation results, how would anyone know if there was indeed a blast pattern?

The whole fuel tank exploding was a crock from day one, including the scientifically impossible animation trying to show how the plane reacted after the explosion.

Lots of people have lots of careers they value, and maybe they value their families too.

Look how many people's lips are sealed about Obama.

Then look at my tagline to see how all this cover-up is possible.

[LFOD]

My wife at the time had something to say about this.

There was an Air Guard/Air Force transport pilot aloft at the time who was interviewed by a camera crew and described the track of a missile up to point of impact.
The next day the pilot was nowhere to be found nor a record of his interview to be had.

The wife said that the pilot had been “shuffled off to Buffalo” for obvious reasons....

[Carriage Hill]

I haven’t flown commercial or private, since July 20. 1996. If I can’t get there by driving, I don’t need to go. JMO.

[silverleaf]

I will never be revealed

It is against “the long term interests” of the naive and traitorous people running US foreign policy to admit the Iran government sponsors terrorists to blow American passenger jets out of the sky

Ditto with PanAm 103. Qadaffi took that inconvenient deep cover op with him to the grave. I'm sure there were US govt officials who secretly agreed the US “owed” a plane full of American tourists to Iran for the Vincennes blowing their marauding or negligent Airbus out of the sky 6 months earlier (think whether Iran ever demanded retaliation? Nope. They got their blood debt repaid).

First of all, we'd have to react - which our “government” refuses to do

Second, it might make things “difficult” for those emergent “moderates” in Iran the US State Department has been trying to find and “encourage” since 1974

It has even been uttered that Obama’s nuc sellout to Iran is intended to help the Iranian “moderates”, which I'm sure is met with earnest approval over mojitos and white wine in the parlors of many Georgetown parties. You little people who use a hard “G” for “Ghengis” are just too stupid to get it.

[McGruff]

Start here.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/twa.php#axzz3XU37lEKl

[null and void]

Wrong wrong wrong wrong!

It was the center fuel tank.

The proof is that they promptly went through the time and expense of grounding the entire fleet to fix the problem.

[DoodleDawg]

Remember, airplanes just don’t blow up in-flight. The claim that an empty center fuel tank exploded doesn’t pass the sniff test.

And they don't disappear without a trace either. Right?

[null and void]

As you say.

[gr8eman]

When a seaborne missile is fired, it is unmistakable as there are waves in the ocean, but no terrain to mask the origin. I saw a bright orange projectile ascend at a high rate of speed observed from an east northeasterly perspective rising at about an 85 degree north angle from the ocean (which would mean the origin was south of the flight path). A lot of people saw the same thing...so many that they took out an ad in the NY Times to affirm their details were consistent. That wasn't a bottle rocket...it had to be sea-based missile that was locked on to that plane.

The only other possibility in my mind is that a ships radar locked onto the energy from the blast and launched on it.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

If you will remember, a pilot flying off the WEST coast reported seeing a missile fly by him not long after.
The government said it was just a bottle rocket. I remember bottle rockets going maybe 50 yards, not to twenty thousand feet.

[Jonty30]

If you were the military and it was your wayward rocket, you’d probably want it kept secret as well. It also might have been a terrorist attack that the government did not want to acknowledge.

[ladyjane]

One of the reasons they used multiple planes on 9/11 was so the administration couldn’t claim it was an accident.

[babygene]

“And after all that investigation, how many 747’s were grounded to correct that possible short in the fuel tank? Answer: absolutely none.”

Not only that, but if they really thought it was a spark in the fuel tank, it would be very easy to rectify by just flooding the tank with nitrogen as the fuel was pumped out. That could be done with off the shelf components... A scuba regulator and a tank of nitrogen.

[DoodleDawg]

And after all that investigation, how many 747’s were grounded to correct that possible short in the fuel tank? Answer: absolutely none.

How many Airbus A330's were grounded after the Air France flight went missing? Answer: absolutely none. How many DC-10s were grounded after that United Flight lost its center engine and crashlanded at Sioux City, Iowa? Answer: absolutely none. How many MD-11s were grounded after that Swissair flight went down off Canada in 1998? Answer: absolutely none. How many 767s were grounded when that Lauda Air flight broke up over Malaysia? Answer: absolutely none. How many A320s were grounded after that Indonesian Air filght went down in December? Answer: absolutely none.

They don't ground airplanes. Not without specific reason.

[CyberAnt]

So what’s new ..?? We know from the witnesses that a missile left the ground and struck the plane. So what’s the problem with admitting something unusual happened.

And .. several years ago .. after the wreckage was inspected by another group .. I heard they documented the evidence of residue that could only have come from a missile.

Therefore, while the leftists in this country try to hide everything .. we still know the truth.

Funny thing .. TWA 800 (couldn’t allow the public to believe it was a TERROR attack - though many in Clinton’s administration KNEW IT WAS). Then, Benghzai (again, couldn’t allow the public to believe it was a TERROR attack - but the Obama/Clinton administration KNEW IT WAS).

I find this information distressing - and it means to me that ALLLLLLLLL LIBERAL MEMBERS OF GOVT are determined to keep the truth from the American people - which leaves us open to attack at any moment.

Since the Govt’s primary responsibility is to provide for our security .. why on earth would any American want ANY LIBERAL in charge of their govt ..?????????

[eastforker]

My NJCT is that the plane was being hijacked and was about to be turned around back to NYC like 911. That to me would have justified it being shot down.

[SkyDancer]

But yet no terrorist group has claimed responsibility. If it was an 'accidental' shoot down how was the gov't able to keep thousands of people involved quiet? Some low paid sailor would have run to the NY Post with the story.

Just consider the hundreds of people who would have to be made quiet about this.

[Stayfree]

There were unproven reports of explosive residue on some of the passenger seats. Also, Ron Brown’s partner was on the plane. Prior to the downing of flight 800, Ron Brown was the crooked Commerce Secretary until his plane was guided into a hillside in Yugoslavia. A nurse who attended him said that there was a bullet hole in his head. She later died from having her throat slit.