Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Gun Owners Get Angry
psmag.com ^ | 4/13/2015 | Kate Wheeling

Posted on 04/13/2015 7:27:46 AM PDT by rktman

Tens of thousands of gun-loving Americans gathered in Nashville, Tennessee, this past weekend for the National Rifle Association’s annual convention. Despite early headlines that claimed attendees would have to leave their guns at home, convention goers were able to bear arms in the conference center—and almost in the city’s public parks. In a nation with nearly as many privately owned guns as there are citizens, even NRA members support laws that block patients with histories of psychiatric commitments from owning guns. But a new study shows that curbing gun violence will require more comprehensive policies than just keeping firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill.

(Excerpt) Read more at psmag.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; guncontrol; nra; tennessee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Yup another study. Another one states that gun owners are 15 million times more likely to go berserk and randomly start shooting everybody in sight because a fly go smashed on their windshield. Or something. Credibility factor----ZERO! But, they got the lie out first so countering it is nearly impossible. Due to the IPOS/SPOS/LPOS/UPOS lack of comprehension.
1 posted on 04/13/2015 7:27:46 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
more comprehensive policies

The following 'policy' is comprehensive:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right to Keep and Bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

How 'bout that, Katie?

2 posted on 04/13/2015 7:30:35 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Time to repeal all firearms laws nationwide to 2nd ammendment.


3 posted on 04/13/2015 7:31:40 AM PDT by exnavy (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The authors suggest that rather than screening potential gun owners based on their mental health history, “gun restrictions based on criminal records of misdemeanor violence, DUI/DWIs, controlled substance crimes, and temporary domestic violence restraining orders could be a more effective—and politically more palatable—means of limiting gun access in this high-risk group.”

They want to violate God-given rights that are protected in the Constitution (the supreme law of the land) - based on a DWI or an unsubstantiated accusation from an angry ex? No, thank you. Trying to do that will bring out a whole lot of angry gun owners. The far left totalitarian fringe should be more cautious.

4 posted on 04/13/2015 7:34:01 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Another one states that gun owners are 15 million times more likely to go berserk and randomly start shooting everybody in sight because a fly go smashed on their windshield.

I'm certainly willing to do more than my share.

5 posted on 04/13/2015 7:39:41 AM PDT by upchuck (The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
even NRA members support laws that block patients with histories of psychiatric commitments from owning guns.

No, we don't. We advocate those of us that are NOT mentally ill having the ability to protect ourselves and our families from those that would go off the deep end. I don't have a problem with crazies getting guns, so long as I can fight back. Against all crazies, foreign, domestic and tyrannical.

6 posted on 04/13/2015 7:41:35 AM PDT by dware (The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Trying to do that will bring out a whole lot of angry gun owners.

I've come to the place in life where I am perfectly willing to die protecting my rights. The question is, are they willing to die trying to take them from me?

7 posted on 04/13/2015 7:42:45 AM PDT by dware (The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dware

I’ll support that.
IF I GET THE RIGHT TO PICK WHO THE CRAZIES ARE
Period


8 posted on 04/13/2015 7:48:40 AM PDT by hans56 (WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY,IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dware
I've come to the place in life where I am perfectly willing to die protecting my rights. The question is, are they willing to die trying to take them from me?

I wonder how many Americans over 60 (70?) feel the same. My guess is you're not alone.

9 posted on 04/13/2015 7:49:14 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The authors suggest that rather than screening potential gun owners based on their mental health history, “gun restrictions based on criminal records of misdemeanor violence, DUI/DWIs, controlled substance crimes, and temporary domestic violence restraining orders could be a more effective

Do these twits have a clue as to how many LEO's this would disarm?

10 posted on 04/13/2015 7:51:44 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Three boxes of Liberty:

Soap Box

Ballot Box

Ammo Box


11 posted on 04/13/2015 7:54:36 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

> The authors suggest that rather than screening potential gun owners based on their mental health history, “gun restrictions based on criminal records of misdemeanor violence, DUI/DWIs, controlled substance crimes, and temporary domestic violence restraining orders could be a more effective
Do these twits have a clue as to how many LEO’s this would disarm?

Just foot in the door terminology to appeal to those who don’t have a working brain who don’t have a clue to what their end game is or why


12 posted on 04/13/2015 7:58:14 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I express my anger at the ballot box.


13 posted on 04/13/2015 7:58:29 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

For those 9 percent of Americans with anger issues, I think they just calculated how many active duty military personnel and veterans, and how many police there are in the US.

Clearly all of them are people with anger issues.


14 posted on 04/13/2015 7:59:30 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

If they passed that law don’t you know the libs would be begging women and their own kind to file domestic vilence charges all over the nation. It would be epidemic. The libs are brainless zombies who match tomthe drone of their Commie overlords not even knowing what they are doing just so they can be a part of something and be accepted by someone, anyone...


15 posted on 04/13/2015 8:01:26 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rktman

If somebody is too “mentally ill” to own a gun, then he’s too crazy to be loose on the streets. Do they think that guns are the only way a berserk crazy can kill lots of people? Do they think that a crazy can’t also do lots of damage with a sword or a bucket of gasoline?


16 posted on 04/13/2015 8:04:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Nope. Only guns are evil methods of offing people. All other methods are apparently A-Ok with these assclowns.


17 posted on 04/13/2015 8:05:14 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

If they passed that law don’t you know the libs would be begging women and their own kind to file domestic violence charges all over the nation. It would be epidemic. The libs are brainless zombies who march to the drone of their Commie overlords not even knowing what they are doing just so they can be a part of something and be accepted by someone, anyone...


18 posted on 04/13/2015 8:05:31 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1
The authors suggest that rather than screening potential gun owners based on their mental health history, ...

I'm wary of this every time I have to correct my doctor's staff about "why" I take an anti-depressant.

I do NOT have a history of "depression."

19 posted on 04/13/2015 8:06:29 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"Roughly 8,865 per 100,000 Americans—usually young, white males living on the edges of urban areas—have both guns and anger issues, and 1,488 of those people like to carry those guns around with them."

Except that angry white "clingers" with CCW aren't the "problem" demographic for firearm homicides. And that demographic is certainly not "young, white males living on the edges of urban areas". The US would have roughly the homicide rate of Norway without the "problem" demographic.

Liberals must live their lives with their heads stuck so far up their **** that they can't hear or see anything at all.

* I am not-so-young but white and I just wrote out the checks for my state and federal taxes so you betcha I have "anger issues" today! Still, everyone is about as safe today as a baby in a Republican mother's womb!

20 posted on 04/13/2015 8:06:36 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson