Posted on 04/08/2015 10:23:23 AM PDT by Zakeet
In the wake of the Indiana donnybrook over religious liberty, which somehow was transformed overnight into a question of gay rights, it couldn’t be long before the New York Times weighed in against Christians.
Yet who could have expected the draconian measures the Times would propose? Either Christians fully embrace the gay lifestyle, or you will be coerced into doing so.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin
When the war breaks out over this, I want to be the first one to throw a molotov through the Times’ window.
14th Amendment, Section 1:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Note that the “privileges or immunities” term which John Bingham, the main author of Section 1, used in that section is just another way to refer to constitutionally enumerated rights, most of these well-known rights, including 1st Amendment-protected freedom of religious expression, listed in the Bill of Rights.
That is beautiful.
That was pretty good.
5.56mm
How about embracing the actual LGBTs so hard that they are loved to death (death of their old sinful selves).
This is more theologically apt.
ba-doom-TISH!
“Everything not prohibited is mandatory!”
You will have anal sex with a homosexual or else be prosecuted!
Pretty picture, but not so sure how well it depicts the fundamental salvation mission of Christendom.
The Almighty also used righteous armies to defeat evil.
Our founding fathers, against all odds, beat the snot out armies hell bent on instilling tyranny. I read their personal writings and get a sense they were divinely inspired.
Just sayin
I remember when California repealed the statute banning sodomy, Bob Hope said he was leaving before they made it mandatory. I guess it is mandatory now.
My attitude since the beginning has been...if homosexuals want to pretend that they’re married, that’s fine with me. I’ve got no real problem with it. But, if homosexuals, or anyone else, wants to force me to pretend that these homosexuals are married, then we’ve got a BIG problem!!
Worth repeating as a mantra.
Bingo!
The only way out of this mess is to recognize that church and state are separate. While civil legality is determined by consensus or legal interpretation, and is therefore subject to a great deal of flexibility, there does need to be room in civic life for religious belief and practice. This is exactly what I was afraid of when you blur that line as was done in that stupid law which seems to have been “fixed” by making it worse! @$#% liberaltarians!
It is getting close tothe real reset time folks.
The left can’t contain their hatred and violence towards those that disagree and have differing worldviews than theirs.
Let’s fae it, they cannot coexist peaceably and one needs to be purged. I have my idea who wins.
Yeah, I can’t help it; was born this way.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts
The cops take care of that sodomy law. FN tax collectors that’s all they are.
I was born this way too....I can’t help it...and stop picking on me because I’m just “different” to think two frilly males sticking their youknowhats up each others rear is pretty weird...
Mine eyes have seen the coming of the glory of the Lord
- there’s a line in there about a terrible swift sword...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.