Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Media Narrative" -- [nar-uh-tiv]

noun: a story or account of events, experiences, or the like, whether true or fictitious.

1 posted on 03/30/2015 5:03:46 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

anything to distract from Benghazi and the powderkeg the ME is today.


2 posted on 03/30/2015 5:05:53 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yay! ... for Oklahoma!


3 posted on 03/30/2015 5:06:55 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

These laws remove the club from the gaystapo’s hands!


4 posted on 03/30/2015 5:07:26 PM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Can I ask how the left decides on what issues, and at what time, they decide to have meltdowns over issues?

Take this Indiana law, for example. Considering that a number of other states have such laws, and the federal version of the law was cited in the Hobby Lobby decision, clearly such laws are constitutional. Yet the left decided only in recent days to have a meltdown over these laws, when Indiana passed their law. Why then, and why now?

Why the calls to boycott Indiana, when Indiana is only one of many states with such laws?

Why did the left have a meltdown over the Arizona illegal alien law, when their law mirrored the existing federal laws on the subject of illegal immigration?

Why did places such as L.A. decide to boycott Arizona in response to that law? But then, when it was discovered that L.A. buys about 25% of their electricity from Arizona, L.A. decided not to boycott Arizona. So then, what is the leftist position? That you can’t boycott and make a political statement if it interferes with air conditioners cooling off the people of L.A.??

Why did the left have a meltdown over stand your ground laws at the time of the Trayvon Martin case, when many states had had stand your ground laws for decades, and, stand your ground was not even part of the Martin case in the first place? What caused the left to have their hissy fit over stand your ground, at a time and a place in which it wasn’t even an issue?

Why did the left NOT have meltdowns over ten years ago, when state after state passed laws or amendments defining marriage as a man and a woman? Certainly they were pissed off about those laws. But they never organized boycotts or had meltdowns over those laws.


6 posted on 03/30/2015 5:45:47 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This was orchestrated by the Progressives. Just one more part of the divide and conquer plan. Whether it be blacks, war on women, queers, welfare queens, etc., just find a minority and see how much feces you can stir up. Does His Arrogance have martial law in mind after he gets them all fighting each other?


7 posted on 03/30/2015 5:50:00 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (There is an uncanny similarity between a pack of jackals and the MSM news readers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Fearless.


8 posted on 03/30/2015 6:08:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson