[Responsibility2nd]

Its almost amusing to see the hatred and vile bigotry of the left as they rant against - not just Christians here - but against fundamental Constitutional Rights.

[Mercat]

I’m waiting for my nephews to post some weirdness about this on Facebook and then I may post this article in response.

[detective]

Link does not work.

[a fool in paradise]

But the Left, ever-vigilant against group-based slights on behalf of favored constituencies, is only too eager to label orthodox Christians as threats to the public.

A greater "threat" than the Red Menace.

Are you now or have you ever been a Christian?

There is a political purge going on and the homofascist media is cheering this time.

[Pride in the USA]

I’m thinking that Indiana sounds like a good place for right minded folk to vacation this year . . . in large supportive numbers.

[Tzimisce]

There’s like 3 liberal women on twitter and 10k bots that agree with them.

[jmacusa]

‘’They will know we are Christians by our love.’’ They'll also know were Christians when we start a crusade and by God start thumping the dayligts out of the haters. The Left and the anti-Christains say we're ''haters'','' homophobes ''and every other vile thing under the sun and we plead ourselves blue in the face and what does it get us? More hatred , more exclusion , more bigotry. By God then, lets start paying them back in their own coin. "You can't have a Christian prayer group on this campus because you're excluding so-and so''? "Oh yeah"'? "Pow!'' right in their pie-hole, "Well God just said I could, f**k you!''.

[Steve_Seattle]

Bob Costas - a truly stupid, dishonest, and hypocritical person - devoted an entire half-hour (or was it an hour?) to this topic today. I wished I could have been the one posing the questions, because I could have made him look like the fraud that he is.

[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . it’s disturbing to see well-informed CEOs such as Apple’s Tim Cook conjuring up the specter of the Old South."

Tim Cook is a boofer, so why is this surprising?

Alpha gays are very powerful, very spooky, and very mean. They go for the kill.

[ConservingFreedom]

After all, the current RFRA legal tests were the law of the land for all 50 states — constitutionally mandated — until the Supreme Court’s misguided decision in Employment Division v. Smith, where the Court allowed fear of drug use to overcome its constitutional good sense.

I was glad to surrender my freedom to worship in exchange for the assurance that no American was engaging in recreations of which I disapproved. /s

[RandallFlagg]

I asked on another thread this.
Is this the law that they’re pooping their pampers over?

Religious freedom restoration act. Provides that a state or local government action may not substantially burden a person’s right to the exercise of religion unless it is demonstrated that applying the burden to the person’s exercise of religion is: (1) essential to further a compelling governmental interest; and (2) the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling governmental interest. Provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a state or local government action may assert the burden as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the state or a political subdivision of the state is a party to the judicial proceeding. Allows a person who asserts a burden as a claim or defense to obtain appropriate relief, including: (1) injunctive relief; (2) declaratory relief; (3) compensatory damages; and (4) recovery of court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

[Lysandru]

Top marks on this one! I am super-pissed off about this hysteria. I literally had to turn off the car radio while listening to my favorite ESPN show when this topic came up.

Lord, how I despise the Jackbooted Forces of Tolerance.

The "A" in LGBTA doesn't stand for "Ally," it stands for "Asshole."

[generally]

I’m starting to think the problem is even more fundamental than this. Why should a business be required to provide its services to any particular person? Although I am opposed to discrimination, I also think that a person or business has the right to discriminate in almost any instance. (Exceptions: providing life-or-death goods and services. Maybe a few others like food sales.)

There are male only country clubs. There are female only gyms. There is BET and other companies that may not refuse white customers but they are very black-oriented. I think if you want to have a non-smokers, straight only, male only, Asian only vegetarian restaurant, you should be able to do so. If the market supports it that’s fine. If someone outside that exclusive group can’t get in, and there is demand for it, some aspiring entrepreneur will fill the gap.

Don’t complain if someone hasn’t filled the gap. You want the service, then why don’t YOU start that company? (Not you, Responsibility2nd! I’m referring to the hypothetical complainer.)