Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998

A very poor plan. Likely very unwelcome by the prolifers themselves, high risk of harming bystanders, and little if any chance of either remedying the situation immediately at hand, or preventing future assaults against prolifers, who will in any case be framed and blamed as aggressors.


36 posted on 03/28/2015 6:30:10 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Love rejoices not in evil, but rejoices in the truth." 1 Corinthians 13:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

“A very poor plan. Likely very unwelcome by the prolifers themselves,”

No, they would have no problem with it. It’s a very pro-gun state.

“... high risk of harming bystanders,”

Less chance with that gun than with a nut with a Molotov cocktail thrown from a car.

“and little if any chance of either remedying the situation immediately at hand, or preventing future assaults against prolifers,”

Actually a very good chance of both. You’re forgetting the pure education factor. When you’re a left wing dumbass being shot at smartens you up like nothing else.

“who will in any case be framed and blamed as aggressors.”

Actually, no. One incident where a pro-lifer defends himself will do more to stop attacks on pro-lifers than anything else that any pro-lifer could do.


37 posted on 03/28/2015 6:36:01 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson