Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gaijin
THE QUESTION REMAINS: WHY CHOOSE SNOW TARGET OVER A CITY TARGET..?

If terror was the objective, was it not achieved? A planeload of passengers was proven helpless as its friendly Jihadist copilot flew them into the ground, instilling a new fear among Westerners that their own pilots might be Mohammedan murderers. It was not necessary to aim for a city in order to instill such fear. We are getting jaded when 150 corpses fail to impress us.

72 posted on 03/26/2015 8:45:56 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Always A Marine
If terror was the objective, was it not achieved (by simply slamming into a mountain instead of a city?

Indeed, yes. But just as easily you could say the 9-11 objective was SOME form of terrorism --like kamikaze'ing into the Hudson, or offshore -- yet they chose crowded Manhattan, striking the most densely packed buildings, what's more.

He could have killed himself in a glider, but since he didn't do THAT, clearly instead KILLING was his objective.

Clearly that day and the equipment at hand permitted killing many more, yet he did not.

FIGHTERS SENT TO INTERCEPT...???

80 posted on 03/26/2015 8:53:55 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson