Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deal may let Iran keep centrifuges at fortified site [Israel & Iran]
The Times of Israel ^ | Thursday, March 26, 2015 | George Jahn, Matthew Lee

Posted on 03/26/2015 10:32:18 AM PDT by Star Traveler

Tehran would be allowed to maintain Fordo facility, as long as it allows inspection and doesn’t pursue an atomic bomb.

LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) — The United States is considering letting Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges at a once-secret, fortified underground bunker in exchange for limits on centrifuge work and research and development at other sites, officials have told The Associated Press.

The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that could lead to an atomic bomb and the site would be subject to international inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other restrictions on nuclear-related work.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesofisrael.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; irandeal; israel; nucleariran; obamagivesirannukes; obamairan; usa; waronterror; yemen
It was reported elsewhere that Netanyahu would be okay with 6,000 centrifuges!
1 posted on 03/26/2015 10:32:18 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Obama Aide: People don’t want Iran to have centrifuges!
Obama: Let’s reveal that Israel has nukes, then Iran will have a reason to have a nuke!


2 posted on 03/26/2015 10:36:57 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Bib isn’t gonna wait much longer... I have a feeling a bunch of scientists and technicians are going to meet their virgins before long.


3 posted on 03/26/2015 10:45:36 AM PDT by BigEdLB (We're experienceing the rule of a Roman Emperor, Barack I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

You don’t need centrifuges UNLESS YOU WANT TO BUILD A BOMB.

ADMIN’S TOTAL IGNORANCE; OR WILLFUL BLINDNESS?


4 posted on 03/26/2015 10:48:45 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("The hour has arrived to gather the Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

The “deal” keeps getting better and better...

...for Iran.


5 posted on 03/26/2015 10:51:00 AM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest
Given the fact that Barry Hussein is right now helping Iran takeover entire countries in the Middle East, this is far worse than 'willful blindness'..

This is all aimed at wiping Israel off the map. Barry's hatred for Israel trumps all else.

6 posted on 03/26/2015 10:51:45 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest

Enthusiastic complicity.


7 posted on 03/26/2015 10:51:50 AM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest

Admin’s treason. Like I always said: When it comes to the government there is two sides to every story: What they allow you to know and what they don’t allow you to know. Absolutely no reason Iran needs centrifuges, yet the Regime wants them to have centrifuges. Why? Treason, so Iran can get nukes.


8 posted on 03/26/2015 10:55:12 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 15 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

I don’t disagree with that.

But, I was speaking of the Nuke issue only.


9 posted on 03/26/2015 10:55:39 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("The hour has arrived to gather the Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

10 posted on 03/26/2015 10:57:23 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle
ASSHAT
11 posted on 03/26/2015 11:09:46 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest

In the US we use centrifuges in commercial operations for power plants, no bombs involved.

http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/lesfacility.html

It can be used for bomb making, but not the only use.


12 posted on 03/26/2015 11:11:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Really? Then why would Netanyahu say you don’t need centrifuges - unless you want to have a bomb?

Why on earth would he say that ..??


13 posted on 03/26/2015 11:21:05 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("The hour has arrived to gather the Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest

Because you could pay someone else to enrich your fuel, using a centrifuge or a gaseous diffusion method (which is more expensive).


14 posted on 03/26/2015 11:25:20 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So I was right .. you don’t have to have the centrifuges; you can have somebody else enrich the uranium for you.

Which proves that IRAN wants the bomb.


15 posted on 03/26/2015 11:30:28 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("The hour has arrived to gather the Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest

This may help you understand the issue.

https://fas.org/issues/nonproliferation-counterproliferation/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-enrichment-gas-centrifuge-technology/centrifuges-nuclear-weapon-proliferation/

In 2007, 72 percent of all enrichment was done by centrifuge plants and only 28 by gaseous diffusion. By 2017 centrifuges are projected to account for 96 percent of all uranium enrichment activity .

Current centrifuge facilities have been built ostensibly to enrich uranium for nuclear reactors. Centrifuges present a proliferation danger because precisely the same machines that produce low enriched uranium fuel for a nuclear reactor can produce highly enriched uranium suitable for nuclear weapons. Even a modest centrifuge plant, one sized to fuel a single nuclear power plant, can produce enough HEU for about twenty bombs in a year. The difference between a military and a civilian enrichment plant is just how the machines are piped together in cascades. This means that a fuel plant could quickly be converted into a weapon plant. Moreover, if the starting material for a bomb program were not natural uranium, but fuel-grade uranium that has been stockpiled, then the time to further enrich the uranium to bomb-grade would be reduced by more than 65 percent.

- - - - - -

Frequently Asked Questions About Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Plants
http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/faq.html
Uranium enrichment is one step in the process of manufacturing fuel for nuclear reactors.


16 posted on 03/26/2015 11:31:31 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest
Yes, sovereign nations can choose varying degrees of dependency to other nations for their energy needs.

But commercial centrifuges are commonly used to produce only power reactor fuel. Bomb creation is certainly not their only use.

I am not argueing that Iran needs this capability. Centrifuges are a normal part of the nuclear power industry.

17 posted on 03/26/2015 11:37:03 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Dianne Feinstein: Democrat in all but name Ron Rand Paul: Hillary: by contrast, a Democrat who's not running for POTUS: The Biggest Turd in the Punchbowl:
18 posted on 03/26/2015 11:45:47 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson