Yes, but he's doing it in a way that lets him take a shot at Cruz.
When I first heard about the Bergdahl trade, it never occurred to me to think: "Gee, it's too bad we don't have a president with more leadership experience." My first thought was: "Damn that MF-ing CS-ing traitor in the White House."
I think it's pretty clear that Walker was trying to kill two birds with one stone -- criticizing Obama while taking a shot as Cruz.
Do you really think Obama would have made a different decision if he'd had a prior leadership experience before running for president? I don't.
Besides, by the time Obama made the decision to swap a deserter for five terrorist captives, he'd already had five years of executive experience as President. What good did THAT do him (or us)?
You’re being overly sensitive.
Why don’t you promote Cruz’s good qualities and actions and not work so hard to attribute negatives to Walker.
Tactics like this make you look desperate.
That can’t help Cruz.
We’re dealing with a kool aid drinker here. Last cycle, her flavor was Perry. This time, it’s Walker. She tends to be very mono focused.
Me? I like Walker and Cruz - Cruz a little more. But I’m not going to turn a blind eye if either of them, or anyone else, is making a mistake.